A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceEnables interaction with Plane.so project management API through natural language, allowing users to manage issues, cycles, and projects.
10
MIT
Plane MCP Server
by abelsr
Related Servers
Alternatives to Plane MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Plane project management APIs, offering tools for managing projects, work items, cycles, modules, initiatives, and more through MCP.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables an LLM to act as a project manager across self-hosted Plane workspaces and projects, providing tools for work items, cycles, modules, states, labels, comments, members, and intake triage via Plane's REST API.-
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to programmatically manage projects, work items, modules, cycles, labels, views, and other Plane workspace data on 8seneca's Plane deployment.54MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI models to interact with a self-hosted Plane workspace through MCP tools, supporting task, project, cycle, and module management.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with self-hosted Plane project management instances using X-API-Key authentication, offering tools for project discovery, issue management, and workflow state operations.7MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 30 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools map cleanly to a distinct resource and action. The main potential confusion is between list_work_items, search_work_items, and advanced_search_work_items, but the descriptions clearly distinguish lightweight search from filtered search and paginated listing.
Naming Consistency4/5
The set overwhelmingly follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern like list_projects, create_work_item, archive_page. Minor deviations like advanced_search_work_items and get_work_item_by_identifier are still readable and predictable.
Tool Count2/5
With 30 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold for a 'too many' rating. The tools are individually useful, but the surface is large enough that an agent may struggle to choose among the many list, get, and search variants.
Completeness4/5
Core domains are well covered: work items, pages, comments, and projects all have solid lifecycle operations. Minor gaps exist, such as no update/delete for labels and read-only access to cycles and modules, but these are workable limitations rather than blocking dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues