perf_get_latest_report
Obtain the performance audit report for a specified project, enabling review of visual regression test results.
Instructions
Latest performance audit report.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | No |
Obtain the performance audit report for a specified project, enabling review of visual regression test results.
Latest performance audit report.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Latest performance audit report' without any information about side effects, read-only nature, or required permissions. This is misleadingly minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, which could be considered concise, but it is under-specified. It fails to provide necessary context, making it inadequate for effective tool use.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter, no output schema), the description should still explain the purpose and parameter. It does not, making it incomplete for reliable agent invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter ('project') with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not mention the parameter at all, leaving its meaning and required format completely unknown.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Latest performance audit report' indicates the subject but uses a noun phrase rather than a full verb+resource. It vaguely distinguishes from siblings like a11y_get_report, but it's not explicit about the action (get/retrieve).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance provided. The description does not state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as a11y_get_report or seo_get_report, nor are exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/abecms/visualq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server