pi-session-recall
Related Servers
Alternatives to pi-session-recall
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides full-text search and retrieval of archived Claude Code session transcripts, enabling agents to inspect past sessions without loading entire transcripts.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching and reading local Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex session transcripts from any MCP client, with fuzzy, regex, and full-text search, plus optional semantic search.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve past coding-tool conversations across Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, and Cursor through a local, read-only index.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides local, agentic semantic recall over Claude Code session history, enabling the agent to search past discussions semantically, expand turns, and grep transcripts.512MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only access to Kilo Code and Opencode conversation history stored in a local SQLite database, allowing users to list projects and sessions, read messages, and perform full-text keyword searches across all messages.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides a read-only interface to audit and continue coding agent sessions by extracting plans, intents, and edit authorship from history across multiple agents (Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Antigravity, Pi) via MCP, CLI, and Python SDK.183MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Search vs find overlap slightly since search also recognizes UUIDs, but the descriptions explicitly direct UUID lookups to pi_session_find. Context vs search also share retrieval intent, but context is clearly framed as deterministic lexical context for a question, keeping boundaries workable.
All four tools share the pi_session_ prefix and are mostly verb-suffixed (search, find, read), which reads predictably. pi_session_context deviates by using a noun rather than a verb, a minor inconsistency.
Four tools cover the natural read-only recall surface (text search, ID lookup, contextual retrieval, paged reading) without redundancy. Scope is slightly thin but each tool earns its place.
As a read-only session recall server, it covers search, direct lookup, contextual retrieval, and paged reading with scope and raw-mode options. No obvious gaps for retrieval, though write/export operations are absent (appropriately so for a recall tool).