No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action on memory items: recall (read), propose (create), correct (invalidate), and report_outcome (feedback). Their purposes do not overlap, and the descriptions clearly delineate when to use each.
All tools follow a consistent memory_<verb> snake_case pattern: memory_recall, memory_propose, memory_correct, memory_report_outcome. The convention is predictable and readable.
Four tools is well-scoped for a persistent memory interface, covering the essential agent interactions without redundancy. Each tool earns its place in the memory lifecycle.
The set covers read, create, invalidate, and feedback, but lacks explicit update or delete operations. Agents can work around this by proposing new items and marking old ones as wrong, so the gap is minor.
