Skip to main content
Glama
ab-straiker

MCP Web Validator

by ab-straiker
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Web Validator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • seo-auditor-mcp

      MojoRohjo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language technical and JavaScript SEO audits, including headless rendering, hydration gap analysis, schema validation, AEO checks, and semantic cannibalization detection.
      1
      -

    • interface-audit-mcp

      Vinizeira13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets developers and MCP agents run deterministic local HTML audits, turning inline HTML into structured findings for missing labels, unnamed buttons, skipped headings, ambiguous links, duplicate IDs, and missing landmarks. It also exposes a rule list and returns stable, actionable reports without external API keys.
      2
      MIT

    • web-audit-mcp

      sayuru-akash
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing of websites for performance, SEO, accessibility, security, and mobile readiness, with tools to validate URLs, run page audits, save results, and retrieve reports.
      1
      -

    • SEO Content Analysis MCP

      pelegreenall
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to perform full SEO audits on unpublished HTML, Markdown, or Word documents, including keyword analysis, meta tag suggestions, readability scoring, and heading structure validation.
      12 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly different validation areas: SEO HTML metadata versus JSON-LD schema markup. There is no overlap in purpose, so an agent can easily choose between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same namespace.action convention: seo.metadata and schema.markup. The pattern is predictable and consistent across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is borderline thin for a server called 'MCP Web Validator,' which implies broader validation coverage. The count is reasonable only if the server is intentionally limited to SEO/schema checks.

    Completeness2/5

    For a web validator, the surface has significant gaps: it lacks checks for links, accessibility, performance, canonical tags, Open Graph, robots directives, and deeper schema validation. It covers a narrow slice of SEO/schema markup inspection rather than a complete web validation lifecycle.

    Resources