Skip to main content
Glama
ab-straiker

MCP Web Validator

by ab-straiker
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Web Validator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • seo-auditor-mcp

      MojoRohjo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language technical and JavaScript SEO audits, including headless rendering, hydration gap analysis, schema validation, AEO checks, and semantic cannibalization detection.
      1
      -

    • interface-audit-mcp

      Vinizeira13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets developers and MCP agents run deterministic local HTML audits, turning inline HTML into structured findings for missing labels, unnamed buttons, skipped headings, ambiguous links, duplicate IDs, and missing landmarks. It also exposes a rule list and returns stable, actionable reports without external API keys.
      2
      MIT

    • web-audit-mcp

      sayuru-akash
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing of websites for performance, SEO, accessibility, security, and mobile readiness, with tools to validate URLs, run page audits, save results, and retrieve reports.
      1
      -

    • OnPage.dev MCP server

      seoonpage
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scan pages and whole sites for SEO and AI-search visibility, generate ready-to-paste fixes and validated structured data, and verify HTML before deploy and live results after — all through stable issue codes so an agent can fix problems one by one and prove they are gone.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly different validation areas: SEO HTML metadata versus JSON-LD schema markup. There is no overlap in purpose, so an agent can easily choose between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same namespace.action convention: seo.metadata and schema.markup. The pattern is predictable and consistent across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is borderline thin for a server called 'MCP Web Validator,' which implies broader validation coverage. The count is reasonable only if the server is intentionally limited to SEO/schema checks.

    Completeness2/5

    For a web validator, the surface has significant gaps: it lacks checks for links, accessibility, performance, canonical tags, Open Graph, robots directives, and deeper schema validation. It covers a narrow slice of SEO/schema markup inspection rather than a complete web validation lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources