Atlassian Bitbucket MCP Server
The Atlassian Bitbucket MCP Server enables AI systems to securely interact with Bitbucket Cloud repositories, pull requests, workspaces, and code in real time.
With this server, you can:
Access and manage workspaces: List, filter, and retrieve workspace information
Explore repositories: Search, list, and get repository metadata
Manage pull requests: List, filter, create, and comment on PRs
Search and access code: Perform advanced searches, retrieve file content
Work with branches: Create branches, list them, and view diffs
Track commits: Access commit history and compare changes
Clone repositories: Download repositories locally for development
The server operates locally with your credentials (no remote token storage) and provides Markdown-formatted responses for seamless AI system integration.
Provides authentication and integration with Atlassian services, specifically focused on Bitbucket functionality using Atlassian API tokens.
Allows AI assistants to interact with Bitbucket repositories, including listing repositories, accessing pull requests, viewing commit information, and exploring workspaces.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Atlassian Bitbucket MCP Servershow me all open pull requests that need review"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Connect AI to Your Bitbucket Repositories
Transform how you work with Bitbucket by connecting Claude, Cursor AI, and other AI assistants directly to your repositories, pull requests, and code. Get instant insights, automate code reviews, and streamline your development workflow.
What You Can Do
Ask AI about your code: "What's the latest commit in my main repository?"
Get PR insights: "Show me all open pull requests that need review"
Search your codebase: "Find all JavaScript files that use the authentication function"
Review code changes: "Compare the differences between my feature branch and main"
Manage pull requests: "Create a PR for my new-feature branch"
Automate workflows: "Add a comment to PR #123 with the test results"
Related MCP server: Atlassian Bitbucket MCP Server
Perfect For
Developers who want AI assistance with code reviews and repository management
Team Leads needing quick insights into project status and pull request activity
DevOps Engineers automating repository workflows and branch management
Anyone who wants to interact with Bitbucket using natural language
Requirements
Node.js 18.0.0 or higher
Bitbucket Cloud account (not Bitbucket Server/Data Center)
Authentication credentials: Scoped API Token (recommended) or App Password (legacy)
Quick Start
Get up and running in 2 minutes:
1. Get Your Bitbucket Credentials
IMPORTANT: Bitbucket App Passwords are being deprecated and will be removed by June 2026. We recommend using Scoped API Tokens for new setups.
Option A: Scoped API Token (Recommended - Future-Proof)
Bitbucket is deprecating app passwords. Use the new scoped API tokens instead:
Go to Atlassian API Tokens
Click "Create API token with scopes"
Select "Bitbucket" as the product
Choose the appropriate scopes:
For read-only access:
repository,workspaceFor full functionality:
repository,workspace,pullrequest
Copy the generated token (starts with
ATATT)Use with your Atlassian email as the username
Option B: App Password (Legacy - Will be deprecated)
Generate a Bitbucket App Password (legacy method):
Go to Bitbucket App Passwords
Click "Create app password"
Give it a name like "AI Assistant"
Select these permissions:
Workspaces: Read
Repositories: Read (and Write if you want AI to create PRs/comments)
Pull Requests: Read (and Write for PR management)
2. Try It Instantly
# Set your credentials (choose one method)
# Method 1: Scoped API Token (recommended - future-proof)
export ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL="your.email@company.com"
export ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN="your_scoped_api_token" # Token starting with ATATT
# OR Method 2: Legacy App Password (will be deprecated June 2026)
export ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_USERNAME="your_username"
export ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_APP_PASSWORD="your_app_password"
# List your workspaces
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/workspaces"
# List repositories in a workspace
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/repositories/your-workspace"
# Get pull requests for a repository
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/repositories/your-workspace/your-repo/pullrequests"
# Get repository details with JMESPath filtering
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/repositories/your-workspace/your-repo" --jq "{name: name, language: language}"Connect to AI Assistants
For Claude Desktop Users
Add this to your Claude configuration file (~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.json):
Option 1: Scoped API Token (recommended - future-proof)
{
"mcpServers": {
"bitbucket": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket"],
"env": {
"ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL": "your.email@company.com",
"ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN": "your_scoped_api_token"
}
}
}
}Option 2: Legacy App Password (will be deprecated June 2026)
{
"mcpServers": {
"bitbucket": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket"],
"env": {
"ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_USERNAME": "your_username",
"ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_APP_PASSWORD": "your_app_password"
}
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop, and you'll see the bitbucket server in the status bar.
For Other AI Assistants
Most AI assistants support MCP. You can either:
Option 1: Use npx (recommended - always latest version):
Configure your AI assistant to run: npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket
Option 2: Install globally:
npm install -g @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucketThen configure your AI assistant to use the MCP server with STDIO transport.
Supported AI assistants:
Claude Desktop (official support)
Cursor AI
Continue.dev
Cline
Any MCP-compatible client
Alternative: Configuration File
Create ~/.mcp/configs.json for system-wide configuration:
Option 1: Scoped API Token (recommended - future-proof)
{
"bitbucket": {
"environments": {
"ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL": "your.email@company.com",
"ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN": "your_scoped_api_token",
"BITBUCKET_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE": "your_main_workspace"
}
}
}Option 2: Legacy App Password (will be deprecated June 2026)
{
"bitbucket": {
"environments": {
"ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_USERNAME": "your_username",
"ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_APP_PASSWORD": "your_app_password",
"BITBUCKET_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE": "your_main_workspace"
}
}
}Alternative config keys: The system also accepts "atlassian-bitbucket", "@aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket", or "mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket" instead of "bitbucket".
Available Tools
This MCP server provides 6 generic tools that can access any Bitbucket API endpoint:
Tool | Description | Parameters |
| GET any Bitbucket API endpoint (read data) |
|
| POST to any endpoint (create resources) |
|
| PUT to any endpoint (replace resources) |
|
| PATCH any endpoint (partial updates) |
|
| DELETE any endpoint (remove resources) |
|
| Clone a repository locally |
|
Tool Parameters
All API tools support these common parameters:
path(required): API endpoint path starting with/(the/2.0prefix is added automatically)queryParams(optional): Key-value pairs for query parameters (e.g.,{"pagelen": "25", "page": "2"})jq(optional): JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response - highly recommended to reduce token costsoutputFormat(optional):"toon"(default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or"json"body(required for POST/PUT/PATCH): Request body as JSON object
Common API Paths
All paths automatically have /2.0 prepended. Full Bitbucket Cloud REST API 2.0 reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
Workspaces & Repositories:
/workspaces- List all workspaces/repositories/{workspace}- List repos in workspace/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}- Get repo details/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/refs/branches- List branches/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/refs/branches/{branch_name}- Get/delete branch/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/commits- List commits/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/commits/{commit}- Get commit details/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/src/{commit}/{filepath}- Get file content
Pull Requests:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests- List PRs (GET) or create PR (POST)/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}- Get/update/delete PR/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/diff- Get PR diff/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/comments- List/add PR comments/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/approve- Approve PR (POST) or remove approval (DELETE)/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/request-changes- Request changes (POST)/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/merge- Merge PR (POST)/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/decline- Decline PR (POST)
Comparisons:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/diff/{source}..{destination}- Compare branches/commits
Other Resources:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/issues- List/manage issues/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/downloads- List/manage downloads/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pipelines- Access Bitbucket Pipelines/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/deployments- View deployments
TOON Output Format
What is TOON? Token-Oriented Object Notation is a format optimized for LLMs that reduces token consumption by 30-60% compared to JSON. It uses tabular arrays and minimal syntax while preserving all data.
Default behavior: All tools return TOON format by default. You can override this with outputFormat: "json" if needed.
Example comparison:
JSON (verbose):
{
"values": [
{"name": "repo1", "slug": "repo-1"},
{"name": "repo2", "slug": "repo-2"}
]
}
TOON (efficient):
values:
name | slug
repo1 | repo-1
repo2 | repo-2Learn more: https://github.com/toon-format/toon
JMESPath Filtering
All tools support optional JMESPath (jq) filtering to extract specific data and reduce token costs further:
Important: Always use jq to filter responses! Unfiltered API responses can be very large and expensive in terms of tokens.
# Get just repository names
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace" \
--jq "values[].name"
# Get PR titles and states (custom object shape)
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/pullrequests" \
--jq "values[].{title: title, state: state, author: author.display_name}"
# Get first result only
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace" \
--jq "values[0]"
# Explore schema with one item first, then filter
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/workspaces" \
--query-params '{"pagelen": "1"}'Common JMESPath patterns:
values[*].fieldName- Extract single field from all itemsvalues[*].{key1: field1, key2: field2}- Create custom object shapevalues[0]- Get first item onlyvalues[:5]- Get first 5 itemsvalues[?state=='OPEN']- Filter by condition
Full JMESPath reference: https://jmespath.org
Real-World Examples
Explore Your Repositories
Ask your AI assistant:
"List all repositories in my main workspace"
"Show me details about the backend-api repository"
"What's the commit history for the feature-auth branch?"
"Get the content of src/config.js from the main branch"
Manage Pull Requests
Ask your AI assistant:
"Show me all open pull requests that need review"
"Get details about pull request #42 including the code changes"
"Create a pull request from feature-login to main branch"
"Add a comment to PR #15 saying the tests passed"
"Approve pull request #33"
Work with Branches and Code
Ask your AI assistant:
"Compare my feature branch with the main branch"
"List all branches in the user-service repository"
"Show me the differences between commits abc123 and def456"
Advanced Usage
Cost Optimization Tips
Always use JMESPath filtering - Extract only needed fields to minimize token usage
Use pagination wisely - Set
pagelenquery parameter to limit results (e.g.,{"pagelen": "10"})Explore schema first - Fetch one item without filters to see available fields, then filter subsequent calls
Leverage TOON format - Default TOON format saves 30-60% tokens vs JSON
Query parameters for filtering - Use Bitbucket's
qparameter for server-side filtering before results are returned
Query Parameter Examples
# Filter PRs by state
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/workspace/repo/pullrequests" \
--query-params '{"state": "OPEN", "pagelen": "5"}' \
--jq "values[*].{id: id, title: title}"
# Search PRs by title
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/workspace/repo/pullrequests" \
--query-params '{"q": "title~\"bug\""}' \
--jq "values[*].{id: id, title: title}"
# Filter repositories by role
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/workspace" \
--query-params '{"role": "owner", "pagelen": "10"}'
# Sort by updated date
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/workspace/repo/pullrequests" \
--query-params '{"sort": "-updated_on"}' \
--jq "values[*].{id: id, title: title, updated: updated_on}"Working with Large Responses
When dealing with APIs that return large payloads:
Use sparse fieldsets - Add
fieldsquery parameter:{"fields": "values.name,values.slug"}Paginate results - Use
pagelenandpageparametersFilter at the source - Use Bitbucket's
qparameter for server-side filteringPost-process with JQ - Further filter the response with JMESPath
Example combining all techniques:
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/workspace/repo/pullrequests" \
--query-params '{"state": "OPEN", "pagelen": "10", "fields": "values.id,values.title,values.state"}' \
--jq "values[*].{id: id, title: title}"Best Practices for AI Interactions
Be specific with paths - Use exact workspace/repo slugs (case-sensitive)
Test with CLI first - Verify paths and authentication before using in AI context
Use descriptive JQ filters - Extract meaningful field names for better AI understanding
Enable DEBUG for troubleshooting - See exactly what's being sent to Bitbucket API
Check API limits - Bitbucket Cloud has rate limits; use filtering to reduce calls
CLI Commands
The CLI mirrors the MCP tools for direct terminal access. All commands return JSON output (not TOON - TOON is only for MCP mode).
Available Commands
# Get help
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket --help
# GET request
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/workspaces" \
--jq "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}"
# GET with query parameters
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/pullrequests" \
--query-params '{"state": "OPEN", "pagelen": "10"}' \
--jq "values[*].{id: id, title: title}"
# POST request (create a PR)
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket post \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/pullrequests" \
--body '{"title": "My PR", "source": {"branch": {"name": "feature"}}, "destination": {"branch": {"name": "main"}}}' \
--jq "{id: id, title: title}"
# POST with query parameters
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket post \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/pullrequests/42/comments" \
--body '{"content": {"raw": "Looks good!"}}' \
--query-params '{"fields": "id,content"}' \
--jq "{id: id, content: content.raw}"
# PUT request (replace resource)
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket put \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo" \
--body '{"description": "Updated description", "is_private": true}'
# PATCH request (partial update)
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket patch \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/pullrequests/123" \
--body '{"title": "Updated PR title"}'
# DELETE request
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket delete \
--path "/repositories/myworkspace/myrepo/refs/branches/old-branch"
# Clone repository
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket clone \
--workspace-slug myworkspace \
--repo-slug myrepo \
--target-path /absolute/path/to/parent/directoryCLI Options
For get and delete commands:
-p, --path <path>(required) - API endpoint path-q, --query-params <json>(optional) - Query parameters as JSON string--jq <expression>(optional) - JMESPath filter expression
For post, put, and patch commands:
-p, --path <path>(required) - API endpoint path-b, --body <json>(required) - Request body as JSON string-q, --query-params <json>(optional) - Query parameters as JSON string--jq <expression>(optional) - JMESPath filter expression
For clone command:
--workspace-slug <slug>(optional) - Workspace slug (uses default if not provided)--repo-slug <slug>(required) - Repository slug--target-path <path>(required) - Absolute path to parent directory where repo will be cloned
Debugging
Enable Debug Mode
Set the DEBUG environment variable to see detailed logging:
# For CLI testing
DEBUG=true npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/workspaces"
# For Claude Desktop - add to config
{
"mcpServers": {
"bitbucket": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket"],
"env": {
"DEBUG": "true",
"ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL": "...",
"ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN": "..."
}
}
}
}Log files: When running in MCP mode, logs are written to ~/.mcp/data/@aashari-mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket.[session-id].log
Test with HTTP Mode
For interactive debugging, run the server in HTTP mode and use the MCP Inspector:
# Set credentials first
export ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL="your.email@company.com"
export ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN="your_token"
export DEBUG=true
# Start HTTP server with MCP Inspector
npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket
# Then in another terminal:
PORT=3000 npm run mcp:inspectThis opens a visual interface to test tools and see request/response data.
Common Issues
Server not appearing in Claude Desktop:
Check config file syntax (valid JSON)
Restart Claude Desktop completely
Check Claude Desktop logs:
~/Library/Logs/Claude/mcp*.log(macOS)
Tools not working:
Enable DEBUG mode to see detailed errors
Test with CLI first to isolate MCP vs credentials issues
Verify API paths are correct (case-sensitive)
Troubleshooting
"Authentication failed" or "403 Forbidden"
Choose the right authentication method:
Standard Atlassian method (recommended): Use your Atlassian account email + API token (works with any Atlassian service)
Bitbucket-specific method (legacy): Use your Bitbucket username + App password (Bitbucket only)
For Scoped API Tokens (recommended):
Go to Atlassian API Tokens
Make sure your token is still active and has the right scopes
Required scopes:
repository,workspace(addpullrequestfor PR management)Token should start with
ATATT
For Bitbucket App Passwords (legacy):
Go to Bitbucket App Passwords
Make sure your app password has the right permissions
Remember: App passwords will be deprecated by June 2026
Verify your credentials:
# Test credentials with CLI export ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL="your.email@company.com" export ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN="your_token" npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/workspaces"Environment variable naming:
Use
ATLASSIAN_USER_EMAIL+ATLASSIAN_API_TOKENfor scoped tokensUse
ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_USERNAME+ATLASSIAN_BITBUCKET_APP_PASSWORDfor app passwordsDon't use
ATLASSIAN_SITE_NAME- it's not needed for Bitbucket Cloud
"Resource not found" or "404"
Check the API path:
Paths are case-sensitive
Use workspace slug (from URL), not display name
Example: If your repo URL is
https://bitbucket.org/myteam/my-repo, usemyteamandmy-repo
Verify the resource exists:
# List workspaces to find the correct slug npx -y @aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket get --path "/workspaces"
Claude Desktop Integration Issues
Restart Claude Desktop after updating the config file
Verify config file location:
macOS:
~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Getting Help
If you're still having issues:
Run a simple test command to verify everything works
Check the GitHub Issues for similar problems
Create a new issue with your error message and setup details
Frequently Asked Questions
What permissions do I need?
For Scoped API Tokens (recommended):
Required scopes:
repository,workspaceAdd
pullrequestfor PR management
For Bitbucket App Passwords (legacy):
For read-only access: Workspaces: Read, Repositories: Read, Pull Requests: Read
For full functionality: Add "Write" permissions for Repositories and Pull Requests
Can I use this with private repositories?
Yes! This works with both public and private repositories. You just need the appropriate permissions through your credentials.
What AI assistants does this work with?
Any AI assistant that supports the Model Context Protocol (MCP):
Claude Desktop
Cursor AI
Continue.dev
Many others
Is my data secure?
Yes! This tool:
Runs entirely on your local machine
Uses your own Bitbucket credentials
Never sends your data to third parties
Only accesses what you give it permission to access
Migration from v1.x
Version 2.0 represents a major architectural change. If you're upgrading from v1.x:
Before (v1.x) - 20+ specific tools:
bb_ls_workspaces, bb_get_workspace, bb_ls_repos, bb_get_repo,
bb_list_branches, bb_add_branch, bb_get_commit_history, bb_get_file,
bb_ls_prs, bb_get_pr, bb_add_pr, bb_update_pr, bb_approve_pr, bb_reject_pr,
bb_ls_pr_comments, bb_add_pr_comment, bb_diff_branches, bb_diff_commits, bb_searchAfter (v2.0+) - 6 generic tools:
bb_get, bb_post, bb_put, bb_patch, bb_delete, bb_cloneMigration Examples
v1.x Tool | v2.0+ Equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Changes
All tools now require explicit paths - more verbose but more flexible
Use JMESPath filtering - extract only what you need to reduce tokens
TOON format by default - 30-60% fewer tokens (can override with
outputFormat: "json")Direct Bitbucket API access - any API endpoint works, no code changes needed for new features
Support
Need help? Here's how to get assistance:
Check the troubleshooting section above - most common issues are covered there
Visit our GitHub repository for documentation and examples: github.com/aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket
Report issues at GitHub Issues
Start a discussion for feature requests or general questions
Made with care for developers who want to bring AI into their Bitbucket workflow.
Available Tools
6 toolsbb_cloneClone Bitbucket RepositoryA
Clone a Bitbucket repository to your local filesystem using SSH (preferred) or HTTPS.
Provide repoSlug and targetPath (absolute path). Clones into targetPath/repoSlug. SSH keys must be configured; falls back to HTTPS if unavailable.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspaceSlug | No | Bitbucket workspace slug containing the repository. If not provided, the tool will use your default workspace (either configured via BITBUCKET_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE or the first workspace in your account). Example: "myteam" | |
| repoSlug | Yes | Repository name/slug to clone. This is the short name of the repository. Example: "project-api" | |
| targetPath | Yes | Directory path where the repository will be cloned. IMPORTANT: Absolute paths are strongly recommended (e.g., "/home/user/projects" or "C:\Users\name\projects"). Relative paths will be resolved relative to the server's working directory, which may not be what you expect. The repository will be cloned into a subdirectory at targetPath/repoSlug. Make sure you have write permissions to this location. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate non-read-only and non-destructive. Description adds behavioral details like default clone directory and fallback mechanism. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded with core purpose, no redundancy. Every sentence adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers key points for a simple clone operation. No output schema, but return value is likely a confirmation. Could mention error handling (e.g., if path exists), but overall adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%. Description reinforces targetPath behavior (absolute path suggested, subdirectory creation) and optional workspaceSlug usage, adding practical meaning beyond raw schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the action 'Clone a Bitbucket repository' and destination 'local filesystem', distinguishing it from sibling CRUD tools (bb_get, bb_post, etc.).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides clear guidance on required parameters (repoSlug, targetPath), path behavior (clones into targetPath/repoSlug), and authentication precedence (SSH preferred, falls back to HTTPS). No explicit when-not-to-use, but context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bb_deleteBitbucket DELETE RequestADestructiveIdempotent
Delete Bitbucket resources. Returns TOON format by default.
Output format: TOON (default) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")
Common operations:
Delete branch:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/refs/branches/{branch_name}Delete PR comment:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{pr_id}/comments/{comment_id}Decline PR:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/declineRemove PR approval:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/approveDelete repository:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}(caution: irreversible)
Note: Most DELETE endpoints return 204 No Content on success.
The /2.0 prefix is added automatically. API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | The Bitbucket API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/workspaces", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}/pullrequests/{id}" | |
| queryParams | No | Optional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"pagelen": "25", "page": "2", "q": "state=\"OPEN\"", "fields": "values.title,values.state"} | |
| jq | No | JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}" (extract specific fields), "values[0]" (first result), "values[*].name" (names only). See https://jmespath.org | |
| outputFormat | No | Output format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds value beyond annotations by noting the default TOON output format, typical 204 No Content response, and the irreversible nature of deleting a repository. These details help the agent understand behavior without contradicting annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections, front-loaded purpose, and relevant examples. It is concise without being overly terse, though minor repetition ('Returns TOON format by default') could be trimmed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, no output schema), the description adequately covers output format, common operations, and parameter usage. It references an external API documentation link for completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema coverage, the description enriches parameters with practical examples (e.g., queryParams, jq expressions, outputFormat enum values) that go beyond the schema's basic descriptions, aiding correct invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete Bitbucket resources' and lists specific common operations (delete branch, PR comment, decline PR, etc.), which distinguishes it from sibling tools (bb_get, bb_post, etc.) that have different HTTP methods.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While the description provides a list of common operations and a caution about irreversibility for deleting repositories, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives beyond the implied HTTP method differences.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bb_getBitbucket GET RequestARead-onlyIdempotent
Read any Bitbucket data. Returns TOON format by default (30-60% fewer tokens than JSON).
IMPORTANT - Cost Optimization:
ALWAYS use
jqparam to filter response fields. Unfiltered responses are very expensive!Use
pagelenquery param to restrict result count (e.g.,pagelen: "5")If unsure about available fields, first fetch ONE item with
pagelen: "1"and NO jq filter to explore the schema, then use jq in subsequent calls
Schema Discovery Pattern:
First call:
path: "/workspaces", queryParams: {"pagelen": "1"}(no jq) - explore available fieldsThen use:
jq: "values[*].{slug: slug, name: name, uuid: uuid}"- extract only what you need
Output format: TOON (default, token-efficient) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")
Common paths:
/workspaces- list workspaces/repositories/{workspace}- list repos in workspace/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}- get repo details/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests- list PRs/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}- get PR details/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/comments- list PR comments/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/diff- get PR diff/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/refs/branches- list branches/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/commits- list commits/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/src/{commit}/{filepath}- get file content/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/diff/{source}..{destination}- compare branches/commits
Query params: pagelen (page size), page (page number), q (filter), sort (order), fields (sparse response)
Example filters (q param): state="OPEN", source.branch.name="feature", title~"bug"
JQ examples: values[*].slug, values[0], values[*].{name: name, uuid: uuid}
The /2.0 prefix is added automatically. API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | The Bitbucket API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/workspaces", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}/pullrequests/{id}" | |
| queryParams | No | Optional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"pagelen": "25", "page": "2", "q": "state=\"OPEN\"", "fields": "values.title,values.state"} | |
| jq | No | JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}" (extract specific fields), "values[0]" (first result), "values[*].name" (names only). See https://jmespath.org | |
| outputFormat | No | Output format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true. Description adds value by detailing default TOON format (token-efficient), automatic /2.0 prefix, and schema discovery pattern. No contradictions. Could mention pagination limits or error responses but still robust.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-structured with sections (Important, Schema Discovery, Common paths, etc.) and front-loaded with key guidance. Length is justified by the complexity of the Bitbucket API, but some redundancy in examples could be trimmed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a read tool with no output schema, the description fully compensates by explaining output format, common paths, filters, and a discovery pattern. Covers all practical aspects an agent needs to invoke the tool correctly against Bitbucket API.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 4 parameters. The description adds extensive examples (e.g., query param examples, jq expressions, outputFormat enum), providing meaning beyond the schema. More than baseline 3 due to rich contextualization.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Read any Bitbucket data' and emphasizes read-only nature with a list of common paths. It distinguishes from sibling write tools (bb_delete, bb_post, etc.) by specifying reading operations only.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides explicit cost optimization guidelines: always use jq filter, use pagelen to limit results, and a schema discovery pattern. Also gives common paths and example filters, leaving no doubt when to use this read tool versus alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bb_patchBitbucket PATCH RequestA
Partially update Bitbucket resources. Returns TOON format by default.
IMPORTANT - Cost Optimization: Use jq param to filter response fields.
Output format: TOON (default) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")
Common operations:
Update PR title/description:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}body:{"title": "New title", "description": "Updated description"}Update PR reviewers:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}body:{"reviewers": [{"uuid": "{user-uuid}"}]}Update repository properties:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}body:{"description": "New description"}Update comment:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{pr_id}/comments/{comment_id}body:{"content": {"raw": "Updated comment"}}
The /2.0 prefix is added automatically. API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | The Bitbucket API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/workspaces", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}/pullrequests/{id}" | |
| queryParams | No | Optional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"pagelen": "25", "page": "2", "q": "state=\"OPEN\"", "fields": "values.title,values.state"} | |
| jq | No | JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}" (extract specific fields), "values[0]" (first result), "values[*].name" (names only). See https://jmespath.org | |
| outputFormat | No | Output format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax. | |
| body | Yes | Request body as a JSON object. Structure depends on the endpoint. Example for PR: {"title": "My PR", "source": {"branch": {"name": "feature"}}} |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=false, openWorldHint=true. The description adds valuable context: default TOON output format, cost optimization via jq param, and examples of common operations. It does not disclose error behavior or permission requirements, but the added details are useful.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with a clear purpose statement, cost optimization note, output format info, and bulleted examples. It is moderately concise but could be trimmed slightly without losing clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 5 parameters with 100% schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers essential usage patterns and output format. It lacks details on error handling or rate limits, but provides sufficient context for typical PATCH operations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description enhances understanding by providing concrete examples for each parameter (e.g., path examples, queryParams usage, jq expressions, body structures for PR updates). This goes beyond schema definitions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Partially update Bitbucket resources' and provides specific examples of common operations (e.g., updating PR title, reviewers, repository properties). The verb 'patch' and examples distinguish it effectively from siblings (clone, delete, get, post, put).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for partial updates via examples and contrasts with full updates (PUT) implicitly. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bb_put, and does not mention when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bb_postBitbucket POST RequestA
Create Bitbucket resources. Returns TOON format by default (token-efficient).
IMPORTANT - Cost Optimization:
Use
jqparam to extract only needed fields from response (e.g.,jq: "{id: id, title: title}")Unfiltered responses include all metadata and are expensive!
Output format: TOON (default) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")
Common operations:
Create PR:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequestsbody:{"title": "...", "source": {"branch": {"name": "feature"}}, "destination": {"branch": {"name": "main"}}}Add PR comment:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/commentsbody:{"content": {"raw": "Comment text"}}Approve PR:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/approvebody:{}Request changes:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/request-changesbody:{}Merge PR:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/pullrequests/{id}/mergebody:{"merge_strategy": "squash"}(strategies: merge_commit, squash, fast_forward)
The /2.0 prefix is added automatically. API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | The Bitbucket API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/workspaces", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}/pullrequests/{id}" | |
| queryParams | No | Optional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"pagelen": "25", "page": "2", "q": "state=\"OPEN\"", "fields": "values.title,values.state"} | |
| jq | No | JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}" (extract specific fields), "values[0]" (first result), "values[*].name" (names only). See https://jmespath.org | |
| outputFormat | No | Output format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax. | |
| body | Yes | Request body as a JSON object. Structure depends on the endpoint. Example for PR: {"title": "My PR", "source": {"branch": {"name": "feature"}}} |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description fully discloses behavioral traits: default TOON format, cost optimization via jq, auto-added /2.0 prefix, and output format options. It aligns with annotations (not read-only, not destructive, not idempotent, open-world hint) and adds significant context beyond structured data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with a clear purpose statement, important cost optimization note, and a list of common operations. It is slightly verbose but front-loaded with key information, making it efficient for an AI agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a complex tool with 5 parameters, nested objects, and no output schema, the description is remarkably complete: it covers output formats, cost optimization, common endpoint patterns, and links to the full API reference. No gaps remain.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Despite 100% schema description coverage, the description adds substantial meaning: detailed path examples, jq usage with examples, outputFormat benefits, body structure examples for common endpoints. This greatly aids parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Create Bitbucket resources' and provides multiple specific endpoint examples (create PR, add comment, approve, etc.), distinguishing it from sibling tools that handle other HTTP methods.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains when to use the tool (creating resources) and provides common operations with endpoint and body examples. It lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool references, but the context signals and sibling tool list imply the usage boundaries.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bb_putBitbucket PUT RequestAIdempotent
Replace Bitbucket resources (full update). Returns TOON format by default.
IMPORTANT - Cost Optimization:
Use
jqparam to extract only needed fields from responseExample:
jq: "{uuid: uuid, name: name}"
Output format: TOON (default) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")
Common operations:
Update repository:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}body:{"description": "...", "is_private": true, "has_issues": true}Create/update file:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/srcNote: Use multipart form data for file uploads (complex - prefer PATCH for metadata)Update branch restriction:
/repositories/{workspace}/{repo}/branch-restrictions/{id}body:{"kind": "push", "pattern": "main", "users": [{"uuid": "..."}]}
The /2.0 prefix is added automatically. API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | The Bitbucket API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/workspaces", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}", "/repositories/{workspace}/{repo_slug}/pullrequests/{id}" | |
| queryParams | No | Optional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"pagelen": "25", "page": "2", "q": "state=\"OPEN\"", "fields": "values.title,values.state"} | |
| jq | No | JMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "values[*].{name: name, slug: slug}" (extract specific fields), "values[0]" (first result), "values[*].name" (names only). See https://jmespath.org | |
| outputFormat | No | Output format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax. | |
| body | Yes | Request body as a JSON object. Structure depends on the endpoint. Example for PR: {"title": "My PR", "source": {"branch": {"name": "feature"}}} |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond annotations, describes default TOON output format, automatic /2.0 prefix, and cost optimization behavior. No contradictions with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-structured with clear sections, but slightly verbose. Front-loaded with purpose and important notes. Could trim some redundant phrasing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers main usage patterns and cost optimization. Lacks explicit error handling or response structure details, but examples and reference link partially compensate. Good for a mutation tool with no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
All parameters have schema descriptions, and the tool description adds context: path format, jq usage examples, outputFormat enum explanation, and body structure examples. Significantly enhances schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it is for 'Replace Bitbucket resources (full update).' Distinguishes from sibling tools (bb_patch for partial updates) and provides common operation examples.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly recommends using PATCH for metadata when updating files, provides cost optimization tips (jq param), and lists specific common operations with endpoints and request bodies. Clearly guides when and how to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Each tool corresponds to a distinct HTTP method (or clone operation) with clear purposes: clone for local cloning, delete for deletions, get for reads, patch for partial updates, post for creations, and put for full replacements. There is no overlap.
All tools follow a consistent 'bb_<verb>' pattern using HTTP method names (clone, delete, get, patch, post, put). The naming is predictable and uniform.
With 6 tools, the server provides a concise CRUD+L (clone) interface for Bitbucket. This is well-scoped for a MCP server; each tool has a clear role without unnecessary bloat.
The tools cover all standard CRUD operations plus cloning. However, specific workflows like merging or approving PRs are handled via generic post/put, which may require agents to construct endpoint paths. A dedicated tool for common composite operations could improve completeness slightly.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Connect your team's living knowledge base — docs, data, issues, CRM — to Claude and ChatGPT.
Connect AI assistants to your GitHub-hosted Obsidian vault to seamlessly access, search, and analy…
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
One workspace of tools for Claude and ChatGPT: connect 600+ apps, generate media, build tools.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Bitbucket Cloud repositories, allowing users to manage pull requests, comments, tasks, and branches through natural language commands.5,0331MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Bitbucket Cloud and self-hosted instances for pull request reviews, code search, repository operations, and managing PR comments and approvals.19GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to programmatically manage Bitbucket Cloud resources, including pull requests, repositories, and branches, automating code review workflows.189MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Bitbucket Cloud repositories, pull requests, pipelines, and code review tasks through natural language.743MIT
Appeared in Searches
- A server for finding information about Bitbucket, the Git repository hosting service
- Guide to connecting to Bitbucket Data Center
- Bitbucket pull request reviewer information
- Bitbucket integration for CursorAI to manage repositories and pull requests
- Bitbucket integration for repository and pull request management
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server