Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dsa-coach-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to discover unsolved Codeforces practice problems, analyze tag performance, and inspect submissions, profiles, rating history, and upcoming contests through MCP-compatible clients.
      6
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables analyzing Codeforces activity through local MCP tools, including weekly practice summaries, problem recommendations, user comparisons, weak-topic detection, contest tracking, and rating progress.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A complete, all-in-one MCP server for Codeforces, enabling AI assistants to access user profiles, compare users, search problems, get practice recommendations, and more.
      8
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for GitHub and competitive programming (Codeforces) that enables AI assistants to fetch user profiles, repository stats, contest history, and personalized problem recommendations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This is an MCP server for tracking your progress through DSA questions with spaced repetition, built-in NeetCode 150 list, and tools to log attempts, get next problems, and view stats.
      31 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that acts as a personalized interview prep coach, tracking DSA problems, scheduling spaced-repetition revisions, and providing RAG-based concept explanations grounded in your own notes.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action: platform metadata, profile lookup, problem search, review logging, due revisions, mistake labels, mistake journaling, and mistake analytics. The closest overlap is between mistake_kinds (label vocabulary) and mistake_patterns (aggregated counts), but the descriptions make the boundary clear enough.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tools are all snake_case and readable, but they mix verb-first names (list_platforms, get_profile, search_problems, log_review) with noun-phrase names (revisions_due, mistake_kinds, mistake_patterns). The inconsistency is noticeable but not chaotic.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is a well-scoped set for a DSA coaching workflow, covering discovery, review scheduling, and mistake tracking without obvious filler. Each tool appears to earn its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main coaching loop: inspect platforms and profiles, find problems, log reviews, see due revisions, and analyze mistakes. Minor gaps exist around explicitly updating solved status or managing platform connections, but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues