post_giveaway_question

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description fully discloses behavior: posts comment, tracks state locally, refuses double-post unless force=True, returns Studio URL for manual pin. Clearly explains limitations and special conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences covering main action, state tracking, and result. Front-loaded and efficient with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters and no output schema, description explains main behavior and result format. Could mention error handling or return structure explicitly, but sufficient for typical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, description implicitly covers 4 of 5 parameters: video_id, question, rules_url, and force. Missing dry_run parameter, but overall adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Post' the specific resource 'giveaway question comment' with unique question and official-rules link. Distinguishes from siblings like 'post_video_question' by mentioning state tracking and double-post prevention.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage by describing the refusal to double-post unless force=True, and highlights the lack of a pin API. Could explicitly state when not to use vs alternatives, but provides clear behavioral context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.