set_strip_gain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description provides the gain range and unity point, which is useful. However, it does not disclose the effect of the dry_run parameter, whether the operation is destructive, or what happens if the strip does not exist. The description is adequate but could be more thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. Every part adds value: verb, resource, unit, constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter, the description covers the main parameter but omits details on dry_run, error cases, and return behavior. With no output schema, the agent might not know what to expect after invocation. Somewhat incomplete but not critically so.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain individual parameters. It mentions gain_db implicitly but provides no details on strip or dry_run. The description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and the resource 'a strip's fader gain', including the unit (dB) and value constraints (0 = unity; range -60..+12). This distinguishes it well from siblings like set_bus_gain (bus vs strip).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for adjusting strip gain, but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like mute_strip or set_strip_routing. No guidance on prerequisites or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.