set_replay_buffer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic start/stop behavior. It omits any side effects (e.g., buffer clearing on stop), authorization requirements, or state implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the key purpose. However, it lacks necessary elaboration on the second parameter and behavioral details, making it minimally adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and two parameters with 0% coverage, the description is too sparse. It does not explain the practical implications of starting/stopping the buffer or the effect of 'dry_run', leaving the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description only adds meaning for the required 'active' parameter by linking it to start/stop. The optional 'dry_run' parameter is entirely ignored, leaving its purpose undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (start/stop) and the resource (replay buffer) with explicit mapping to the boolean value. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'save_replay' which saves the buffer rather than enabling/disabling it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'save_replay' or 'start_stream'. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for enabling the replay buffer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.