bcn.query_resource_geo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations supplied, so description must disclose behavior. It mentions that active near/bbox calls use generated CKAN SQL internally and explains coordinate field inference. It does not explicitly state read-only nature or error behavior, but the geospatial focus and 'safe' mention imply non-destructive behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single paragraph of five sentences, each adding distinct value: purpose, data sources, query types, coordinate inference, and fallback for ambiguous fields. No fluff, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 13 parameters, nested objects, and an output schema, the description covers the core geospatial functionality and most important parameters. It lacks details on filters and pagination, but those are standard. Overall adequate for initial selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 8%, so the description compensates by explaining the main geospatial parameters (near, bbox, within_place, contains, group_by, lat_field, lon_field). However, it does not explain filters, offset, or fields, leaving some gap for complex filters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: running bounded geospatial queries over Open Data BCN resources with WGS84 coordinates. It distinguishes from sibling tools like bcn_query_resource by specifying geospatial capabilities and listing query types (near, bbox, within_place, etc.).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Use near for distance queries, bbox for rectangular areas, within_place for district/neighborhood polygons...'. It also clarifies that it works for DataStore-active resources and safe CSV/JSON downloads, setting prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.