Skip to main content
Glama
aaguiarz

OpenFGA Modeling MCP Server

by aaguiarz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenFGA Modeling MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • dev-skills

      parikrut
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that equips AI assistants with specialized, opinionated development playbooks for building microservices, frontends, databases, and DevOps pipelines. It integrates with clients like VS Code Copilot, Claude Desktop, and Cursor to provide battle-tested expertise.
      42 npm
      MIT

    • DevForge-MCP

      Sanket2329
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to intelligently understand, analyze, edit, navigate, and review software projects with multi-workspace support, Git integration, and semantic search.
      1
      MIT

    • ArchMCP

      ShubhamScript
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A centralized remote MCP server that gives AI coding assistants real-time microservices architecture intelligence, including service search, database schema lookup, API discovery, and change blast-radius analysis.
      1
      MIT

    • Microsoft Style Guide MCP

      mbender-ms
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A professional MCP server for analyzing content against the official Microsoft Writing Style Guide, enabling style, grammar, terminology, and accessibility checks via AI tools like VS Code and GitHub Copilot.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Both tools have clearly distinct purposes: listing all contexts vs. getting a specific context based on a query. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (list_available_contexts, get_context_for_query).

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the low side but acceptable for a focused server that only needs to retrieve context prompts. It doesn't feel too sparse given the narrow domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides read operations (list and get). Missing create, update, delete operations for context prompts, which are likely needed for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources