Skip to main content
Glama
aabGit

research-tools

by aabGit
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to research-tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • myscrape

      Bonifatius94
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-contained web-research MCP server that lets local LLM agents search, fetch, and synthesize web content using tools like web_search, web_fetch, and web_research.
      2
      MIT

    • bathys

      Korrnals
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run local deep-research workflows via a single MCP stdio server, combining web search, page extraction, query-aware distillation, and caching without cloud quotas. It exposes tools for deep research, search, and single or batch URL reading.
      6
      119 PyPI
      MIT

    • Lookout

      SylphxAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling local-first web search, fetch, extract, and caching with citeable excerpts, no API key required. Supports research workflows for agents and apps.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT

    • crawl4ai-mcp

      pazyork
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server for agent-friendly web extraction and search. Offers two tools: fetching real pages with Playwright and Crawl4AI, and searching across 7 engines with automatic fallback.
      34
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    search_web is for querying the web and returning snippets, while fetch_page retrieves full content from a specific URL. Their purposes are completely distinct and easily distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_web, fetch_page), making the naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a general research purpose. While each tool is essential, the minimal count borders on insufficient for complex workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools cover the basic research loop of searching and fetching content. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no ability to refine searches or manage results), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources