Skip to main content
Glama
a5768549

Model Worker MCP

by a5768549
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Model Worker MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP ToolHub

      zhihaochen67
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform workspace-confined file operations, read-only Git inspection, and structured shell commands, while requiring out-of-band human approval for mutations and external executions and maintaining an audit trail.
      14
      3
      -

    • ForgeGuard MCP

      KatoteshiKuka
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to safely inspect and modify project files within explicitly allowed workspace roots, with controls for file operations, git status/diff, and optionally allowlisted command execution.
      11
      Apache 2.0

    • Repo MCP

      jazzyalex
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives ChatGPT and Claude Code policy-scoped access to a local repository checkout, allowing them to list, search, read, edit, and create files, run operator-approved fixture tests, and inspect git diffs. It confines operations to configured paths and resources, and supports an independent read-only review workflow.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Strata Coder

      huyinghuan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables a primary coding agent to delegate bounded implementation and repair tasks to a local OpenAI-compatible model that edits a copy of the project, runs configured checks, and returns artifacts for review. Exposes stdio tools for capability discovery, task submission, progress polling, artifact reading, and cancellation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    route_code_task and delegate_code_task both initiate delegated coding work, which could cause some initial confusion, but the descriptions clarify that one performs risk classification and auto-routing while the other directly runs a bounded task. The remaining tools (status, cancel, usage) are clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (route_code_task, delegate_code_task, get_task_status, get_usage_summary), but cancel_task breaks the pattern by omitting the 'code' qualifier used by the delegation tools. The set is still readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a task delegation worker: routing, execution, status, cancellation, and usage reporting. Each tool clearly earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: initiate/route, run, check status, cancel, and inspect usage. Minor gaps exist, such as no list/history operation to enumerate past tasks or a retry/resume capability, but these are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources