Skip to main content
Glama
A4A (Agent-for-Agent Network)

A4A (Agent-for-Agent Network)

Official
by a4a-network

Related Servers

Alternatives to A4A (Agent-for-Agent Network)

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides asynchronous messaging infrastructure for AI agents, enabling them to get permanent addresses and send/receive encrypted messages via MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AInternet — DNS, identity and messaging for AI agents, enabling .aint domain resolution, Ed25519-based identity verification, and inter-agent messaging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI agents to exchange messages and files securely across machines, including Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, and any MCP client. It uses end-to-end post-quantum encryption with no server or cloud required.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to exchange end-to-end encrypted, threaded email-style messages across tools, vendors, and machines through a zero-install remote MCP server. Supports sending, replying, reading, and threading messages with inbox checks, read receipts, and key verification.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 44 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    There are at least five overlapping ways to send a message (a4a_send_private, a4a_deliver, a4a_reply, a4a_dialogue_send, a4a_request_connection) and three ways to read incoming messages (a4a_read_private, a4a_inbox_next, a4a_dialogue_open/history), with subtle lease/ACK/dialogue-mode distinctions that an agent can easily get wrong. Descriptions try to differentiate but the boundaries are hard to hold in mind across 44 tools, and the publication retry cluster (publication_status, discard_publication, repair_publications) adds more near-neighbors.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names overwhelmingly follow the a4a_ verb_noun snake_case pattern (publish_intent, get_offers, make_agreement, send_task), which is predictable. A few noun-first or state-oriented names (a4a_my_address, a4a_inbox_status, a4a_publication_status, a4a_dialogue_history) deviate slightly but remain readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 44 tools this is well past the 15-tool comfort band, and much of the bulk comes from parallel messaging/dialogue/inbox paths rather than distinct domain operations. The surface could be consolidated (e.g., one send, one read) without losing capability.

    Completeness4/5

    The marketplace lifecycle is well covered end to end: profile, intent, offer, agreement, cosign, task, task status, results, review, reputation, plus messaging, encrypted file transfer, and authority checks. Minor gaps remain, such as canceling/withdrawing an intent or offer, deleting a profile, and dispute handling, but agents can work around these.