Debate status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but the description discloses that it displays saved configuration and API key status. It implies a read-only operation without side effects. Would benefit from explicitly stating it doesn't modify anything.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-load the key information: what is shown (first sentence) and when to use it (second sentence). No unnecessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the output content (debaters, providers, models, API keys) and usage context. No output schema exists, so the description serves as the sole documentation for what the agent can expect. Could be enhanced with more detail on output structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters, the schema trivially covers everything. The description adds value by explaining what information the tool returns, meeting the baseline for 0-param tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it shows the saved debate setup including specific components like debaters, providers, models, and API key status. It distinguishes from siblings 'challenge' (likely starting a debate) and 'configure_debate' (changing settings) by focusing on status display.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to call this to confirm setup or when the user asks about debaters. Provides clear context for use, though no exclusion criteria given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.