Skip to main content
Glama
a-polishchuk

Yes or No MCP

by a-polishchuk

Related Servers

Alternatives to Yes or No MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A demonstration MCP server built in TypeScript that shows how to implement stdio-based communication for integration with MCP clients. Serves as a template for building custom MCP servers with strong typing and maintainability.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A basic TypeScript implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed as a starting point for MCP development. Provides a minimal foundation for building custom MCP servers with stdio configuration for local integration with VS Code and GitHub Copilot.
      1
      -
    • -
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A simple Model Context Protocol server implemented in TypeScript that enables communication with client applications (like Cursor) over standard input/output and includes a basic calculator tool as an example.
      4
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A TypeScript-based server project that can be integrated with Cursor IDE as an MCP (Model Control Protocol) server, enabling enhanced development capabilities.
      134
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server implementation using Node.js and TypeScript that bridges AI models with external tools and data sources via JSON-RPC.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A TypeScript-based MCP server that connects with MCP clients like Claude, VS Code, and Cursor, providing tools like echo, sum, time, and customizable prompts.
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'getYesOrNo' stands alone with a distinct purpose, making disambiguation trivial and perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'getYesOrNo' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and with no other tools to compare, there is no inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most practical server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. For a server named 'Yes or No MCP', which suggests a simple decision-making or random response service, one tool might be minimal but still functional, but it feels thin and underdeveloped compared to typical MCP servers.

    Completeness3/5

    Inferring the domain as providing yes/no responses, the single tool 'getYesOrNo' covers the core functionality. However, there are obvious gaps: no ability to customize responses, set parameters, or handle variations, which limits agent workflows. The surface is basic but not severely incomplete for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues