Skip to main content
Glama
Yes or No MCP

Yes or No MCP

by a-polishchuk

Related Servers

Alternatives to Yes or No MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A demonstration MCP server built in TypeScript that shows how to implement stdio-based communication for integration with MCP clients. Serves as a template for building custom MCP servers with strong typing and maintainability.
      ISC
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A basic TypeScript implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed as a starting point for MCP development. Provides a minimal foundation for building custom MCP servers with stdio configuration for local integration with VS Code and GitHub Copilot.
      1
      -
    • -
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A simple Model Context Protocol server implemented in TypeScript that enables communication with client applications (like Cursor) over standard input/output and includes a basic calculator tool as an example.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A TypeScript-based server project that can be integrated with Cursor IDE as an MCP (Model Control Protocol) server, enabling enhanced development capabilities.
      133
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server implementation using Node.js and TypeScript that bridges AI models with external tools and data sources via JSON-RPC.
      2
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A TypeScript-based MCP server that connects with MCP clients like Claude, VS Code, and Cursor, providing tools like echo, sum, time, and customizable prompts.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'getYesOrNo' stands alone with a distinct purpose, making disambiguation trivial and perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'getYesOrNo' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and with no other tools to compare, there is no inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most practical server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. For a server named 'Yes or No MCP', which suggests a simple decision-making or random response service, one tool might be minimal but still functional, but it feels thin and underdeveloped compared to typical MCP servers.

    Completeness3/5

    Inferring the domain as providing yes/no responses, the single tool 'getYesOrNo' covers the core functionality. However, there are obvious gaps: no ability to customize responses, set parameters, or handle variations, which limits agent workflows. The surface is basic but not severely incomplete for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues