create_supershift_shifts_from_text

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states the tool creates shifts (non-read-only) and defaults to dry-run (important safety detail). However, it fails to mention whether it overwrites, requires specific permissions, or has any side effects. The brief description leaves significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences) and front-loaded with the core purpose. However, it could include more structured details without being verbose. It scores a 3 because it is acceptably short but lacks critical information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters, no annotations, and an output schema (not shown), the description is incomplete. It does not explain how the output relates to the action, nor does it clarify the role of parameters like backend or profile_path. The tool's complexity demands more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description is the only source for parameter meaning. It mentions 'free text' and 'dry-run' implicitly, but does not explain backend, profile_path, or default_timezone. The value added is minimal beyond the schema structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the core action: 'Parse free text and create shifts through a configured backend.' The verb 'create' and resource 'shifts' are specific. However, it does not differentiate this tool from siblings like create_supershift_shifts (which likely takes structured input) or parse_shifts_text (which may only parse without creating).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Defaults to dry-run' which hints at a control flag but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, scenarios, or when not to use it. Siblings like create_supershift_sqlite_shifts_from_text are not addressed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.