Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Pull request tools are clearly separated by operation (get, create, update, merge, approve, etc.) and by scope (list vs detail, comments vs inline comments vs replies). Pipeline tools are similarly distinct for runs, steps, and logs.

Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_pull_request, create_pull_request_comment, get_pipeline_steps). Even the slightly longer names like request_pull_request_changes or diagnose_pipeline_failure remain readable and align with the pattern.

26 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the scope intentionally covers both pull request management (21 tools) and pipeline inspection (5 tools). Each tool serves a distinct, non-redundant purpose, making the count justified rather than bloated.

The pull request lifecycle is well covered: create, update, merge, decline, approve, request changes, comments, diffs, commits, and statuses. Pipelines cover listing, getting details, steps, logs, and failure diagnosis. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no general list of PRs filtered by state, no pipeline triggering), but they are non-critical for most workflows.