Skip to main content
Glama
Zoldenburg-me

Safe-MPC

by Zoldenburg-me
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Safe-MPC

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • nyquist-mcp

      osaxyz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous agents to create and operate an Ethereum Safe wallet, send ETH or call contracts with their own signatures, and check transaction status without human approval or custody.
      0
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • CryptoMCP

      RMAAPK
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query multichain balances, inspect smart contracts, and draft DeFi interactions while enforcing anti-drainer protections such as approval blocking, destination whitelisting, spend caps, and human approval gates.
      11 npm
      MIT

    • WETH

      ayushkumar2601
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Ethereum wallets, simulate transactions, and draft transfers with deterministic policy and risk scoring, requiring human approval before on-chain execution.
      6 npm
      ISC

    • ows-mcp-wallet

      Danmwihoti
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check balances and send transactions across multiple blockchains with automatic spending limit protection and policy enforcement.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct resource and voting path (Safe queue, Snapshot off-chain, Snapshot X on-chain, Governor). There is some potential overlap among Snapshot read tools and among the several vote-casting tools, plus legacy Governor read tools, but descriptions usually make the intended path clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and most are grouped by domain prefix (safe_, snapshot_, governor_). However, several are noun phrases rather than verb_noun, and vote_log/vote_schedule lack the domain prefix used elsewhere, so the pattern is not fully uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 21 tools the surface is heavy, though some size is justified by supporting three different voting systems. Legacy Governor read tools and the generic snapshot_query add breadth that could likely be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The voting lifecycle is well covered: discover spaces/proposals, inspect state and voting power, cast votes, confirm Safe transactions, and review past votes. Minor gaps remain around generic Safe transaction proposal/execution and Governor queue/execute operations, but core Safe voting workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources