No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct evidence layer: search_community covers lived experience, search_web covers published claims, search_demand covers transactions and workarounds, and read_discussion is an explicit follow-up for thread-level depth. The meta tools (corpus_stats, providers_status) are clearly separated from search operations, so there is no real ambiguity.
The search_* tools are consistently named with a clear verb_noun pattern, and read_discussion follows suit. corpus_stats and providers_status are descriptive and readable but don't follow the verb-first pattern, creating a minor stylistic inconsistency rather than confusion.
Six tools is a well-scoped size for a research assistant. Each tool earns its place: three distinct search layers, one deep-dive reader, and two diagnostic/infrastructure tools that support the search workflow without bloating the surface.
The set covers the core research loop well: finding lived-experience evidence, published claims, demand signals, reading full Reddit threads, checking corpus depth, and diagnosing provider issues. The main gaps are lack of direct arbitrary URL/content fetching and no obvious way to query the accumulated corpus itself beyond stats.
