research-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to research-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables configuration-driven, budgeted multi-source web research across platform and web search adapters, merging duplicate links, preserving provenance, and returning honest source coverage reports.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables federated search across open-access scientific literature, legal full-text retrieval with provenance, and full-text search over papers already stored locally.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP-native research assistant — search backend, intent-routing, and writing pipeline that carries a question through search, verification, and writing, delivering whatever research you need: quick answers, verified sources, or a finished document.47388 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to run deep research, quick searches, and report writing, and to retrieve research sources and context through MCP-compatible clients.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to run deterministic deep research consensus arbitration by parsing queries, evaluating source authority and contradictions, and returning structured JSON dossiers and telemetry.8-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run research queries across multiple public sources (Hacker News, Reddit, GitHub, Brave Search) in parallel, returning normalized results.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct evidence layer: search_community covers lived experience, search_web covers published claims, search_demand covers transactions and workarounds, and read_discussion is an explicit follow-up for thread-level depth. The meta tools (corpus_stats, providers_status) are clearly separated from search operations, so there is no real ambiguity.
The search_* tools are consistently named with a clear verb_noun pattern, and read_discussion follows suit. corpus_stats and providers_status are descriptive and readable but don't follow the verb-first pattern, creating a minor stylistic inconsistency rather than confusion.
Six tools is a well-scoped size for a research assistant. Each tool earns its place: three distinct search layers, one deep-dive reader, and two diagnostic/infrastructure tools that support the search workflow without bloating the surface.
The set covers the core research loop well: finding lived-experience evidence, published claims, demand signals, reading full Reddit threads, checking corpus depth, and diagnosing provider issues. The main gaps are lack of direct arbitrary URL/content fetching and no obvious way to query the accumulated corpus itself beyond stats.