maimemo_list_notepads

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered structurally. The description adds nothing beyond that — no mention of pagination behavior, filtering semantics, or result ordering for a listing endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness — a single fragment with no front-loaded scope, constraints, or usage cue. Nothing is wasted because almost nothing is said.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter listing tool with full schema coverage and annotations, the description still omits pagination expectations, default limits, and how it differs from get_notepad. An agent could call it, but with notable guesswork about result set shape and filtering.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with ids, limit, and offset each documented in the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description contributes no additional meaning about how ids interact with limit/offset or what filtering is applied.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The phrase '查询云词本' identifies a read/list operation on notepads, so the basic verb+resource is present. However, it says nothing to distinguish this from the sibling maimemo_get_notepad (single fetch) or maimemo_list_notes, leaving the agent to infer scope from the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus maimemo_get_notepad, maimemo_list_notes, or the create/update/delete notepad siblings. The only weak hint is that it is a list-style tool, which the name already conveys.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.