Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mike-plus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to drive HEC-RAS headless — inspecting projects, validating and executing 1D steady, 1D unsteady and 2D plans, and reading hydraulic results from HDF5 files. It also supports limited model modification, such as setting steady discharges, all without the Windows desktop application or a programmatic API.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables querying HEC-RAS project information, geometry elements, plan results, and compute messages through natural language, allowing interaction with hydraulic modeling projects.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Eleven local stdio MCP servers exposing a reproducible EPA SWMM stormwater-modelling workflow: model building, simulation with run manifests and continuity checks, calibration, GIS/QGIS, design storms and climate scenarios, uncertainty analysis, plotting, and modelling memory.
      4
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Automates OpenFOAM CFD simulations via MCP, enabling AI agents to mesh, run, and post-process cases from natural language prompts without any API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a toolbox for interacting with EPA SWMM stormwater models, enabling users to analyze model data and interpret results through LLM-driven tools. It assists stormwater modelers in understanding hydraulic systems and modeling behavior using natural language interfaces.
      18
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: reading/setting parameters, model info, three plot types, results listing/reading/summary, and simulation execution. No overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'mike_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., get_values, plot_network, results_list). The verbs are descriptive and uniformly formatted.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. The number covers the essential operations for MIKE+ modeling without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core workflow: model info, parameter read/write, simulation run, and results analysis/plotting. Minor gaps include lack of tools for structural model editing or scenario management, but for the intended purpose it is solid.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive