Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to alphaledger

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables quant research organizations to log hypotheses and outcomes, count trials for honest statistical verdicts, explore novel methods, run significance gates, and evolve reusable skills from validated trajectories, all backed by SQLite.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables A-share quantitative factor workflows from any MCP client, including sandboxed factor execution, qlib backtesting, out-of-sample admission checks, daily factor computation, decay monitoring, ML training/prediction, and portfolio/volatility analytics.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to capture and replay intermittent software failures, minimize reproductions, compare trials, search regressions, verify proposed fixes against a saved failing baseline, and retrieve investigation evidence without rerunning commands.
      39 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides point-in-time financial data access and an honest backtesting engine via MCP, enabling users to research restated fundamentals, run backtests with deflated Sharpe metrics, and benchmark returns against published factors.
      8
      41 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables recording and analyzing AI agent execution traces, including event logging, metric computation, loop detection, and JSON export for debugging agent behavior.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: fingerprint checks identity without a trial, evaluate records evidence, ledger_stats summarizes behavior, and gate re-judges existing trials. The only mild overlap is between evaluate and gate, both of which return family-adjusted verdicts, but their preconditions and use cases are clearly separated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and readable, but they mix noun-style names (fingerprint, gate, ledger_stats) with a verb (evaluate). There is no single predictable verb_noun or noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused factor-research ledger. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow and none feels redundant or excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: identify a factor, evaluate and record it, inspect ledger health, and re-judge recorded trials. Minor gaps exist around listing or retrieving individual trials and explicit import/export operations, though these may be intentionally outside the server's scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues