Skip to main content
Glama
Zhekinmaksim

proofmarket-mcp

by Zhekinmaksim
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to proofmarket-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GateCore by GateCoreAI-com

      GateCoreofficial

      GateCoreAI-com
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover governed capabilities, inspect machine-readable contracts, and request policy-checked procurements with signed receipts and audit trails.
      Apache 2.0
    • Fabric Marketplace by Fabric-Protocol

      Fabric Marketplaceofficial

      Fabric-Protocol
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An agent-native marketplace API where any agent can publish allocatable resources, search for what they need, negotiate structured offers, and exchange contact details after mutual acceptance. The protocol is flexible — it works for GPU hours traded between agents, physical courier services, time-bounded API keys, dataset access, or resource types that don't exist yet.
      1
      -

    • APIVouch

      ShahadatTest
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to route goals across multiple independent APIs, enforce constraints, reject invalid evidence, and return verified outcomes with tamper-evident receipts.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear boundaries: submit_proof_request and poll_proof handle request lifecycle, simulate_coordination explores scenarios, and compose_workflow orchestrates. However, market_state and simulate_coordination both report utilization and gaps, so agents could initially confuse which to use for current market health vs. hypothetical coordination regimes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set is mostly verb_noun (simulate_coordination, submit_proof_request, poll_proof, compose_workflow), but market_state breaks the pattern as a noun phrase rather than get_market_state, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is appropriate for the server's focus on market analysis, request submission, status polling, and workflow composition. It's neither sparse nor bloated, covering the core interactions with a proof market.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: market state inquiry, simulation for planning, request submission, result polling, and workflow orchestration. Missing operations like canceling requests or listing historical requests are workable gaps, but the essential seeker-approval journey is represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources