Skip to main content
Glama
ZhaoDay

stu-management-mcp

by ZhaoDay

Related Servers

Alternatives to stu-management-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A model-agnostic MCP server exposing example tools (add1, multiply2, greet) for learning purposes, working with any LLM through stdio transport.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server with four tools (add, greet, text_stats, divide) demonstrating typed parameters, structured outputs, and error handling over stdio transport.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A learning-oriented MCP server that exposes basic tools (echo, add, reverse) over stdio transport to validate MCP handshake and tool calls.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local Python MCP server that provides basic tools like greet, add_numbers, and system_info, designed for process-based connections via stdin/stdout.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lightweight MCP server that exposes tools for system information and weather lookup, designed for agent integration via stdio.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one computes an average, one evaluates a score, and one retrieves a student name. There is no overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: calculate_average, evaluate_score, get_student_name. This consistency makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 3 tools, the set is relatively small but not unreasonably thin for a focused utility server. However, given the 'student management' label, the count feels slightly sparse, though still within a reasonable range.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools do not form a coherent student management surface. Only get_student_name pertains to students, while the other two are generic utilities. Missing are typical student CRUD operations, so an agent cannot perform meaningful management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues