Skip to main content
Glama
ZethicTech

obsidian-mcp

by ZethicTech
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to obsidian-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • obsidian_mcp

      troxeldj
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables reading, writing, searching, and managing Obsidian vault notes through MCP tools and prompts, allowing AI agents to interact with local knowledge bases.
      -

    • Obsidi MCP

      cameronsjo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes Obsidian vault tools via Model Context Protocol (MCP) server over stdio, HTTP, or SSE transports, enabling AI assistants to read, write, search, and manage vault notes with 28+ built-in tools and CLI bridge integration.
      1
      -

    • obsidian-mcp-pro

      christian-german
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with comprehensive access to Obsidian vaults, enabling reading, writing, searching, tagging, linking, canvas manipulation, and semantic search through 41 tools.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as create_note vs append_note vs prepend_note. However, a few pairs like get_properties (retrieve all properties) and read_property (single property value) could cause minor confusion, but descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The naming follows a highly consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_note, delete_note, list_files, search_with_context). The only minor outlier is 'wordcount', but it is still descriptive and does not break the overall pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 34 tools, the server exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and enters the 'too many' category. While the domain is rich, the large number may overwhelm agents and suggests some tools could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers most CRUD operations for notes, properties, daily notes, links, tasks, and tags. Notable gaps include no explicit folder creation/deletion tools, but the run_command escape hatch provides flexibility, and core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources