Creates multiple proxies in a single operation and returns their unique identifiers.

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare non-readonly, non-destructive, non-idempotent, and closed-world behavior. The description adds a crucial behavioral trait: errors during individual proxy creation are ignored, implying partial success. This is useful context beyond annotations, though atomicity and batch limits are not covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and then the error-handling note. No redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The definition covers purpose and a key failure mode, and annotations supply the safety profile. However, with no output schema, the description does not explain return values (though the title does) and omits batch size limits or atomicity guarantees, which matter for a bulk operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters (body, folderId, workspaceId) are documented in the schema. The description only mentions 'array of proxy data' which adds no semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool creates proxies from an array, clearly indicating a bulk creation operation. It distinguishes from create_proxy through 'array' and 'all specified proxies', though it does not explicitly name the single-create sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this bulk tool versus create_proxy or other alternatives, nor any prerequisites. The bulk context is implied by 'array' but not stated as a decision rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.