Skip to main content
Glama

List Expirations

hudu_list_expirations
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get all dated expirations for a client in one list—domains, SSL certificates, warranties, asset date fields, and article reviews. Filter by company ID to see what expires soon.

Instructions

List expirations in Hudu. An expiration is a dated thing that will stop working: a domain registration, an SSL certificate, a hardware warranty, a date field on an asset, or an article review date.

This is the single call that answers "what is about to expire for this client". Hudu gathers expiry dates from across every module into one list, so you do not have to walk websites, then assets, then articles separately. Filter by company_id for one client and read the date field on each entry.

Each entry points at the thing that expires through expirationable_type and expirationable_id rather than embedding it — so once you have found the interesting entries, fetch the underlying record with the matching tool (hudu_get_website, hudu_get_asset, hudu_get_article) to get its name and details.

There is no date-range filter: Hudu returns the entries and this server passes them through unchanged, so compare date yourself rather than expecting the API to have narrowed to "the next 30 days". Entries are not filtered by whether they have already passed either — a date in the past means something has already expired.

Expirations are read-only through the API. To change one, edit the record that produced it: the website's expiry, the asset field's date, and so on.

Returns an object with items plus pagination facts. Note that the Hudu API returns no total count for any collection, so page_was_full is the only honest signal that more records exist — read pagination_note before concluding a list is complete.

Operation class: Read.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number. Hudu has no cursor or offset — only pages.
fieldsNoReturn only these top-level fields on each record. Use it to keep large lists small — e.g. ["id","name","company_id"]. Unknown field names are ignored.
page_sizeNoRecords per page (1-100, default 25). Hudu publishes no maximum, so this client clamps at 100; larger values are rejected here rather than silently altered by the server.
company_idNoNumeric company id, to scope the list to one client. The usual first filter — resolve a customer name to an id with hudu_list_companies.
resource_idNoNumeric id of a specific record, to see only its expirations. Must be sent together with `resource_type`.
resource_typeNoHudu record type, written exactly as Hudu spells it: "Asset", "AssetPassword", "Company", "Article", "Website" and so on. Must be sent together with the matching id — either one alone is ignored.
expiration_typeNoKind of expiry to return. `domain` is a domain registration and `ssl_certificate` a TLS certificate, both from website records; `warranty` is hardware support cover on an asset; `asset_field` is a custom date field on an asset layout; `article_expiration` is a documentation review date; `undeclared` covers entries Hudu has not categorised.
response_formatNoOutput shape. 'json' (default) is compact and machine-readable; 'markdown' is easier for a person to read but larger.json
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations, the description discloses that expirations are read-only, that the API returns no total count so page_was_full is the only honest pagination signal, and that entries are not filtered by past dates. It also explains the entry structure uses expirationable_type/id rather than embedding the full record, which is valuable context not present in annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than average but well-structured and front-loaded with a clear definition of expiration. Each paragraph covers a distinct aspect: purpose, filtering, entry structure, pagination behavior, and read-only nature. While verbose, every sentence adds meaningful information and the structure aids scanning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description fully explains the return shape (items plus pagination facts), the entry references via expirationable_type/id, and the date field. It also covers pagination limitations, the lack of date filtering, and how to modify expirations, making the tool's behavior complete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra parameter-specific meaning beyond schema, only mentioning company_id as a typical first filter and the need to read the date field. It does not expand on page, fields, or expiration_type beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly defines the tool as listing expirations in Hudu, with a specific explanation of what an expiration is. It positions this as the single call to answer 'what is about to expire' and contrasts it with walking websites, assets, and articles separately, distinguishing it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use this tool: to get expiry dates across modules without walking each separately. It advises filtering by company_id and warns that there is no date-range filtering, telling users to compare the date field themselves. It also directs users to fetch underlying records with specific sibling tools (hudu_get_website, hudu_get_asset, hudu_get_article).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ZenixSolutions/hudu-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server