Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to GitHub-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A working MCP server that connects to the real GitHub API, enabling users to manage repositories, issues, pull requests, and more through natural language in Claude Desktop.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude live access to your GitHub workspace — PR reviews, issue triaging, repo search, and weekly digest reports through natural language.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.
      523 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Desktop complete intelligence about any public GitHub repository. Research libraries, compare packages, audit dependencies, and explore codebases through natural conversation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP bridge server connecting Claude Chat to any GitHub repository for file operations, issue management, and code search via OAuth 2.0 authenticated Streamable HTTP transport.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, but there is some potential confusion between analysis tools (e.g., analyze_issue vs get_issue) and retrieval tools. Overall, descriptions are clear enough to distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, analyze_, etc.), but 'hello_world' and 'repository_health' deviate from this convention. The naming is mostly consistent with minor exceptions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 15 tools, the server is at the upper edge of a well-scoped set. Each tool seems to serve a distinct purpose, though a few could potentially be consolidated without losing functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The server provides good read and analysis operations for issues, PRs, repositories, and users, but lacks write operations like creating issues, merging PRs, or updating repositories. This limits its utility as a complete GitHub MCP server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues