Zelinqa MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Zelinqa MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to send situations and typed questions to Myles and receive calibrated probabilities, picks, and escalation guidance for routing, risk flagging, approvals, policy checks, and rating tasks.3471 npmApache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to submit completed speech or typed text to a self-hosted decision engine and receive judgments such as ordinary speech, command, retained thought, uncertainty, or no action, along with session and decision inspection.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to run structured QuReDec decision briefs from inside MCP-compatible clients, submitting questions and receiving evidence-backed recommendations with citations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to request human input for decisions, approvals, clarifications, and notifications, with tools for asking, waiting, retrieving responses, and canceling requests through configured channels.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to run dialectical reasoning workflows and player-coach autocoding sessions with independent verification, turn management, and session persistence.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePublic MCP server for agent-created, human-friendly, short-lived surveys. Enables agents to ask structured questions and retrieve answers.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have clear distinct roles (start, status, feedback, forget, next_question), but adjust, add_context and next_question all send information 'without consuming a turn', creating subtle boundaries an agent could misselect between. The detailed descriptions largely resolve this.
All names share a consistent zelinqa_ prefix and are readable, though there is minor mixing of verb forms (adjust, start, forget) with noun forms (status, feedback, next_question). The pattern is predictable enough.
Seven tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct step in the conversation lifecycle. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The set covers the full guided-conversation lifecycle: start/recover, advance (next_question), inspect (status), enrich (adjust, add_context), report outcome (feedback), and release (forget). Minor gaps like an explicit conversation-list or end tool are workable around.