Zelinqa MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Zelinqa MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to submit completed speech or typed text to a self-hosted decision engine and receive judgments such as ordinary speech, command, retained thought, uncertainty, or no action, along with session and decision inspection.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to run structured QuReDec decision briefs from inside MCP-compatible clients, submitting questions and receiving evidence-backed recommendations with citations.18 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to request human input for decisions, approvals, clarifications, and notifications, with tools for asking, waiting, retrieving responses, and canceling requests through configured channels.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to run dialectical reasoning workflows and player-coach autocoding sessions with independent verification, turn management, and session persistence.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePublic MCP server for agent-created, human-friendly, short-lived surveys. Enables agents to ask structured questions and retrieve answers.2MIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to manage conversations, handoffs, context packets, audits, and publishing through the LNKZ REST relay, while exposing resources and prompts for context-aware workflows.24-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have clear distinct roles (start, status, feedback, forget, next_question), but adjust, add_context and next_question all send information 'without consuming a turn', creating subtle boundaries an agent could misselect between. The detailed descriptions largely resolve this.
All names share a consistent zelinqa_ prefix and are readable, though there is minor mixing of verb forms (adjust, start, forget) with noun forms (status, feedback, next_question). The pattern is predictable enough.
Seven tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct step in the conversation lifecycle. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The set covers the full guided-conversation lifecycle: start/recover, advance (next_question), inspect (status), enrich (adjust, add_context), report outcome (feedback), and release (forget). Minor gaps like an explicit conversation-list or end tool are workable around.