Skip to main content
Glama

create_execution_plan

Create execution plans with sequential thinking, risk analysis, and resource estimation to coordinate multi-agent workflows.

Instructions

Create comprehensive execution plan using sequential thinking before spawning agents

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
objectiveYesThe objective to create an execution plan for
repositoryPathYesRepository path where the work will be done
foundationSessionIdNoOptional foundation session ID for cost optimization
planningDepthNoDepth of planning analysisdetailed
includeRiskAnalysisNoWhether to include risk analysis in planning
includeResourceEstimationNoWhether to include resource estimation
preferredAgentTypesNoPreferred agent types for execution
constraintsNoConstraints or limitations to consider
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, state changes, permissions, or effects on existing plans. The description is too brief for a tool with 8 parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single sentence that captures the core purpose. It is concise, but could be slightly more structured to include key details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 8 parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the role of the plan in the workflow or the significance of parameters like planningDepth or constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; all parameters have descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states it creates an execution plan, using sequential thinking before spawning agents. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_execution_plan, update_execution_plan, and execute_with_plan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage before spawning agents, but does not explicitly say when to use this tool vs alternatives. Lack of explicit when-not or alternative explanations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ZachHandley/ZMCPTools'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server