Skip to main content
Glama
ZTUmber

datapack-check-mcp

by ZTUmber

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
DATAPACK_WORKSPACENoSpyglass workspace root. Should point to a pack root with pack.mcmeta or a parent directory containing multiple packs. If not set, check_file will search upward from the file for pack.mcmeta; check_project uses the passed root or process cwd.
DATAPACK_CHECK_LOCALENoSpyglass diagnostics language.en
DATAPACK_CHECK_FILE_TIMEOUT_MSNoTimeout in milliseconds for check_file to wait for diagnostics.30000
DATAPACK_CHECK_READY_TIMEOUT_MSNoTimeout in milliseconds to wait for Spyglass to be ready (including first cache download).180000

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
check_fileA

Run Spyglass (Datapack Helper Plus engine) diagnostics on one Minecraft datapack file (.mcfunction, pack JSON, .mcmeta, .snbt, .mcdoc). Returns path/line/severity/message.

check_projectA

Run Spyglass (Datapack Helper Plus engine) on every .mcfunction, pack JSON, .mcmeta, .snbt, and .mcdoc file under a datapack workspace. Pass the pack root (folder with pack.mcmeta) or a parent folder. First run may download the vanilla cache and take a few minutes.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools are clearly distinct in scope: one checks a single file, the other checks an entire project workspace. There is no overlap or ambiguity about which tool to use for a given task.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent 'check_' verb-noun pattern, with 'file' and 'project' clarifying the target. The naming is predictable and uniform.

Tool Count4/5

The server has only 2 tools, which is below the typical 3-15 range, but the narrow purpose of checking datapack files is well-served by a file-level and a project-level check. The count is slightly thin but reasonable for the scope.

Completeness5/5

The domain is linting/diagnostics for datapack files. The server covers both individual file checks and whole-project scans, which are the only two granularities needed. No obvious operations are missing for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues