Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MS-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to execute Materials Studio modeling and computation tasks via MaterialsScript runtime, with a local Dashboard for monitoring.
      33
      21
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for BIOVIA Materials Studio 2023 on Windows, providing controlled preparation of Forcite and CASTEP inputs, model building, and LAMMPS/VMD pre-processing with reproducible, auditable workflows and strict scientific boundaries.
      53
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex to control Ansys Workbench and ICEM CFD locally, executing scripts, managing projects, and running simulations.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure execution of Python scripts in isolated Docker containers via MCP, with resource limits, package allowlisting, read-only filesystem, and artifact return.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure discovery and invocation of sandboxed filesystem, repository inspection, and utility tools through a unified MCP client with schema validation, timeouts, and execution traces.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control the local Open Science research application, including creating projects, starting or continuing research sessions, inspecting progress and plans, canceling runs, and reading generated artifacts.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools overlap significantly: ms_gui_apply_current, ms_gui_model_current, and ms_gui_edit_current all cover in-place editing actions like Clean/AdjustHydrogen, while structure creation is split across ms_gui_new_structure_current, ms_gui_find_cif_import_current, ms_gui_download_cif_import_current, ms_gui_import_current, ms_gui_create_current, and ms_gui_create_crystal_current. An agent would need deep knowledge of the intended decision hierarchy to reliably choose between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The ms_ prefix and snake_case are used consistently, and the ms_gui_*_current convention for stateful GUI operations is a strong pattern. Some names are awkward or less uniform, such as ms_gui_download_cif_import_current and ms_gui_cleave_surface_vacuum_current, and standalone tools like ms_forcite, ms_castep, and ms_codex_config do not follow the same verb-first style, but the overall pattern is still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 32 tools, this server exceeds the practical MCP surface size and falls into the too-many category. Many of the structure-import and GUI-edit variants could be consolidated into fewer parameterized tools without losing scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers a broad workflow: structure creation/import, editing, simulation engines, GUI queue inspection, file management, and remote CASTEP batch handling. However, result/property retrieval is largely limited to reading text files and batch status, there is no cleanup/delete tool, and DMol3 support is restricted to geometry optimization, leaving notable gaps for some workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues