discord_delete_forum_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states the destructive action 'Deletes' and notes 'optional reason', but does not disclose irreversibility, permission requirements, effects on replies, or return behavior—especially important for a deletion operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loads the action and target, and contains no filler or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a destructive mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema; the description omits important context such as irreversibility, permissions, and what the response contains. The optional reason mention and resource clarification are useful but insufficient for trustworthy invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description adds only 'optional reason' and implies threadId identifies the post/thread. It does not explain what the reason is used for or provide syntax/format details beyond what parameter names already suggest.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Deletes' with a clear resource 'forum post or thread' and mentions 'optional reason'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like discord_delete_message or discord_delete_channel by targeting forum posts/threads.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as discord_delete_message or discord_delete_channel. There are no usage scenarios, prerequisites, or exclusions; only the implied use case from the resource type.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.