Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to WebMCP Script

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables browser-based AI chat interfaces to use local MCP tools by injecting a tool-call protocol into the page and executing approved filesystem, shell, and downstream MCP tool calls from a local daemon.
      413 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to call small utility tools like echo and Markdown-to-PDF conversion, running locally over stdio.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to interact with a browser CAD workbench through model-neutral local stdio or authenticated remote MCP tools, supporting command discovery, design-health analysis, and scoped previews while never reading local files or taking over open sessions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables compatible AI clients to operate a local computer by accessing files, applications, processes, shells, and, on Windows/macOS, graphical desktop controls such as windows, screens, mouse, and keyboard. It runs locally with user permissions and confirmation previews for operations that change the machine.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a verified tool registry (calculator, sandboxed file read, web fetch) over MCP stdio, enabling any MCP-capable client to reuse the same tools from the inspectable ReAct loop.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The set splits into two clear clusters: browser/page tools (inspect_page, describe_tool, call_tool, visit_page) and script/native lifecycle tools, each with a distinct verb. The only real overlap is between 'pages' and 'inspect_page', which both surface tool summaries, though the descriptions distinguish list-vs-inspect.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the convention is mixed: verb_noun (inspect_page, call_tool, describe_tool), a bare noun (pages), noun_noun (connection_info), and two prefix-grouped families (script_*, native_*). Consistent casing makes it readable, but there is no single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    13 tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped 3-15 range, and the granular split of the native workflow (native_build, native_select_build, native_launch) reflects real, distinct steps. Slightly heavy but each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage of the script lifecycle is strong: connection setup, page discovery, schema inspection, invocation, plus script status/preview/import/change and native build/select/launch. Minor gaps like no direct script authoring or connection teardown, but core workflows are fully covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive