Skip to main content
Glama
tabular-ds-mcp
by YusufErem

Related Servers

Alternatives to tabular-ds-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ingest CSV/TSV files, profile and categorize tables, generate SQL DDL for multiple engines, and launch background data workflows whose completion and artifacts can be independently verified.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides MCP-compatible tools for data analysis, including file reading, Python/SQL execution, and hypothesis testing. Enables autonomous data analysis agents to interact with a sandboxed environment.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to safely perform sandboxed file operations, evaluate math expressions, and run read-only SQL queries on a sample database, plus access resources and prompt templates.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives LLM agents access to local and remote data via databases, files, graphs, and structured documents, along with a full data science toolkit for analysis and modeling.
      14
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cover distinct stages of a tabular ML workflow, and descriptions clarify boundaries. Minor overlap exists between profile_dataset and inspect_competition (both inspect data) and among cv_baseline, explain_model, and fit_predict (all fit models), but each targets a different output.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (profile_dataset, compare_train_test, explain_model, check_submission). cv_baseline is a noun phrase and fit_predict contains two verbs, but the overall style remains consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools form a tight workflow from competition inspection to submission validation. Every tool has a clear role and none feels redundant or missing for the intended scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers inspection, profiling, train/test comparison, cross-validation, model explanation, prediction, and submission validation—the core lifecycle for tabular competitions. Minor gaps remain: no explicit tool for joining extra tables or handling multi-table relations, and no tuning or feature-engineering beyond a baseline.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues