get_handler_result

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states the operation without disclosing behavioral traits such as read-only nature, error handling, or return format. For a read operation, it doesn't specify what happens if the command ID is not found or whether the result is always available.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded with the core action. The redundant Korean translation in parentheses adds no information but doesn't significantly hurt readability. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and no annotations, so the description should clarify what a handler result contains and how errors are handled, but it doesn't. The tool is simple with one parameter, but the lack of behavioral context makes it incomplete for an agent to fully understand invocation consequences.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes commandId as 'Filter by command ID', and the description simply repeats this without adding extra meaning, format details, or constraints. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Get' with the resource 'handler result' and scope 'by command ID', making it clear what the tool does. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool get_handler_queue, which likely lists the queue, by emphasizing retrieval of a specific result.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'by command ID' implies usage when a specific command ID is known, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like get_handler_queue or when not to use it. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.