Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
VOICEVOX MCP Server

VOICEVOX MCP Server

by Yuki10Kobayashi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to VOICEVOX MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Voicevox MCP Server

      Dosugamea
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A server that enables Claude 3.7 and other AI agents to access VOICEVOX-compatible speech synthesis engines (AivisSpeech, VOICEVOX, COEIROINK) through the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      12
      MIT

    • Edge-TTS MCP Server

      yuiseki
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides text-to-speech functionality for AI agents using Microsoft Edge's text-to-speech technology, supporting multiple voices, languages, and voice customization.
      2
      8
      MIT

    • voiceroid_daemon-mcp

      mohemohe
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables text-to-speech generation and phonetic kana conversion using VOICEROID2 via voiceroid_daemon. It supports customizable voice parameters and provides cross-platform audio playback for synthesized speech.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'speak' implies text-to-speech synthesis, while 'speakers' likely lists available voice options. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use simple, consistent naming: 'speak' and 'speakers' are both lowercase nouns, with 'speak' as a verb-like noun and 'speakers' as a plural noun. The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a VOICEVOX text-to-speech domain. Expected operations like adjusting voice parameters, controlling playback, or managing audio output are missing, making the set under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a VOICEVOX server. Core functionalities such as voice customization, audio format settings, playback control, or synthesis status checks are absent, leaving significant gaps that will hinder agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources