Scrapbox MCP Server
Allows fetching content from Scrapbox pages by URL, enabling integration with the Scrapbox knowledge base platform.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Scrapbox MCP Servercreate a note titled 'Meeting Notes' with today's discussion points"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
scrapbox-mcp MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol server
This is a TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system. It demonstrates core MCP concepts by providing:
Resources representing text notes with URIs and metadata
Tools for creating new notes
Prompts for generating summaries of notes
Features
Resources
List and access notes via
note://URIsEach note has a title, content and metadata
Plain text mime type for simple content access
Tools
create_note- Create new text notesTakes title and content as required parameters
Stores note in server state
Prompts
summarize_notes- Generate a summary of all stored notesIncludes all note contents as embedded resources
Returns structured prompt for LLM summarization
Related MCP server: Browser-use MCP Server
Development
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildFor development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchInstallation
To use with Claude Desktop, add the server config:
On MacOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
On Windows: %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"scrapbox-mcp": {
"command": "/path/to/scrapbox-mcp/build/index.js"
}
}
}Debugging
Since MCP servers communicate over stdio, debugging can be challenging. We recommend using the MCP Inspector, which is available as a package script:
npm run inspectorThe Inspector will provide a URL to access debugging tools in your browser.
Available Tools
1 toolget_page_contentB
Fetch content from a Scrapbox page by URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Scrapbox page URL (e.g., https://scrapbox.io/project-name/page-title) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool fetches content but lacks details on behavioral traits such as error handling (e.g., invalid URLs, authentication needs), rate limits, or what 'content' entails (e.g., raw HTML, parsed text). This leaves significant gaps for an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste—it directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally complete. It covers the basic purpose but lacks details on behavior and output, which are needed for full contextual understanding. It's adequate but has clear gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'url' fully documented in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond implying it's for Scrapbox pages, which the schema example already suggests. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Fetch content') and target resource ('from a Scrapbox page by URL'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It doesn't need to differentiate from siblings since none exist, but it could be more specific about what 'content' includes (e.g., text, metadata, structure).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when needing page content from a Scrapbox URL, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other fetching methods) or any prerequisites. With no sibling tools, the baseline is adequate but unguided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools, making disambiguation perfect. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (get_page_content), and with no other tools to compare, consistency is inherently perfect. There are no deviations or mixed conventions.
One tool is too few for a server named 'Scrapbox MCP Server', which implies broader functionality for interacting with Scrapbox pages. A single fetch tool feels thin and limited in scope, suggesting an incomplete or minimal implementation.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a Scrapbox server, covering only fetching page content. Obvious gaps include creating, updating, deleting, or listing pages, which are essential operations for managing a wiki or note-taking system like Scrapbox.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Google Keep-style notes app with an MCP server for AI agents to read/write notes.
A simple Typescript MCP server built using the official MCP Typescript SDK and smithery/cli. This…
An MCP server that used to create notes
Markdown-based note-taking with a hosted MCP server. Your notes serve you and your AI.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.121,0283MIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes through Claude Desktop.11,9411MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.23-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.12188MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/YuheiNakasaka/scrapbox-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server