Skip to main content
Glama
YuNaga224

Obsidian Memory MCP

by YuNaga224

create_relations

Define connections between knowledge graph entities using active voice relations to build structured networks in Obsidian.

Instructions

Create multiple new relations between entities in the knowledge graph. Relations should be in active voice

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
relationsYes

Implementation Reference

  • Core implementation of the createRelations tool: loads graph, checks for duplicates, updates source entity markdown files with new relations using addRelationToContent, and returns created relations.
    async createRelations(relations: Relation[]): Promise<Relation[]> {
      const graph = await this.loadGraph();
      const newRelations: Relation[] = [];
      
      for (const relation of relations) {
        // Check if relation already exists
        const exists = graph.relations.some(r => 
          r.from === relation.from && 
          r.to === relation.to && 
          r.relationType === relation.relationType
        );
        
        if (exists) continue;
        
        // Update the source entity file
        const fromPath = getEntityPath(relation.from);
        try {
          const content = await fs.readFile(fromPath, 'utf-8');
          const updatedContent = addRelationToContent(content, relation);
          await fs.writeFile(fromPath, updatedContent, 'utf-8');
          
          newRelations.push(relation);
        } catch (error) {
          if (error instanceof Error && 'code' in error && (error as any).code === 'ENOENT') {
            throw new Error(`Entity ${relation.from} not found`);
          }
          throw error;
        }
      }
      
      return newRelations;
    }
  • index.ts:55-76 (registration)
    Tool registration in ListToolsRequestSchema handler: defines name, description, and input schema for create_relations tool.
    {
      name: "create_relations",
      description: "Create multiple new relations between entities in the knowledge graph. Relations should be in active voice",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          relations: {
            type: "array",
            items: {
              type: "object",
              properties: {
                from: { type: "string", description: "The name of the entity where the relation starts" },
                to: { type: "string", description: "The name of the entity where the relation ends" },
                relationType: { type: "string", description: "The type of the relation" },
              },
              required: ["from", "to", "relationType"],
            },
          },
        },
        required: ["relations"],
      },
    },
  • MCP CallToolRequestSchema dispatch case: handles tool invocation by calling storageManager.createRelations and formatting response.
    case "create_relations":
      return { content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(await storageManager.createRelations(args.relations as Relation[]), null, 2) }] };
  • Input schema definition for validating arguments to the create_relations tool.
    inputSchema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        relations: {
          type: "array",
          items: {
            type: "object",
            properties: {
              from: { type: "string", description: "The name of the entity where the relation starts" },
              to: { type: "string", description: "The name of the entity where the relation ends" },
              relationType: { type: "string", description: "The type of the relation" },
            },
            required: ["from", "to", "relationType"],
          },
        },
      },
      required: ["relations"],
    },

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'create' and offers an active-voice guideline, but does not mention idempotency, validation of from/to entities, behavior on duplicates, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with a brief second clause. Every word earns its place and the main purpose is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations or output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits critical details such as whether from/to entities must already exist, how duplicates are handled, and whether creation is atomic for the batch.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% at the top level, so the description needed to compensate. It adds the active-voice guideline but does not explain the structure of the relations array or the meaning of from/to/relationType, which the schema already partially covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create), the object (multiple new relations), and the context (knowledge graph). It distinguishes from siblings like delete_relations and create_entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for creating relations, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or mention any prerequisites. The active-voice guideline is a style note, not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.