Skip to main content
Glama
Yu-Qiao-sjtu

Wisp FigureFree

by Yu-Qiao-sjtu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wisp FigureFree

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • weavatrix-js

      Weavatrix
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local repository intelligence MCP server that builds a reusable graph of code structure for AI coding agents, providing 34 network-free tools for understanding, searching, and analyzing repositories without data leaving the machine.
      40 npm
      MIT

    • artifacty

      raeseoklee
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, agent-to-agent artifact exchange for LLM workflows. Enables MCP-capable tools like Claude, Codex, and Gemini to publish, list, read, update, and continue from artifacts without copying content through chat.
      167 npm
      MIT

    • surveyHelper

      rich7420
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that analyzes research papers, maps citation graphs, and surfaces insights with verbatim-verified contradictions, all while keeping data private on your machine.
      1
      MIT

    • uacos

      caotiensinh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first code intelligence and safety layer for AI coding agents. MCP server exposes dependency graph, impact analysis, and AST-compressed repo context, backed by typed local memory, patch-scope safety gates, and git-independent transaction rollback.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 65 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The plan_/apply_ pairing gives most tools a distinct operation, and descriptions are unusually explicit about host/audience constraints. However, four preview variants (preview, preview_exact, preview_exact_headless, preview_working_revision) and two confirm variants (confirm_selection, confirm_selection_headless) overlap heavily and require host-context knowledge to tell apart, which will trip up an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses a uniform snake_case figure_library_ prefix with a consistent verb_noun scheme, and the plan_/apply_ lifecycle pattern is applied predictably across nearly all mutation operations. No mixed conventions or ad-hoc naming.

    Tool Count2/5

    65 tools is far beyond a comfortable surface for any agent, and the plan/apply discipline roughly doubles the count for each lifecycle action. Although the domain is genuinely broad, this is heavy enough that discovery and correct selection become a real burden.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is remarkably thorough: search/describe, preview, bind, working revision lifecycle, publish/discard/restore, export/import bundles, full restore/fork, style profiles, project figure planning/archiving, submission packaging, GitHub PRs, and provider source management. Minor gaps may exist but no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources