A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceA powerful MCP server that enables LLMs to safely execute code, control file systems, search the web, and integrate with services like Gmail and TMDB.
MIT
mcp-toolkit
by YoshiLoL0526
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-toolkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides real-time web search to AI agents via a pay-per-search USDC microtransaction system.529 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA modular MCP server providing file operations, web search, URL scraping, and sandboxed command execution for LLM interactions.1MIT
xngmcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes web_search and web_fetch tools, enabling web search via SearXNG and fetching readable public pages.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP tool server that gives any AI agent the ability to search, scrape, and analyze content across the internet.42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables web searching, URL content extraction, and summarization without requiring API keys. It also provides advanced mathematical evaluation and multi-language Wikipedia summary retrieval tools.5266 npm6MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The five memory_* tools handle different CRUD operations for persistent storage, while run_js and run_python execute code in different languages, and web_search performs internet searches. There is no overlap in functionality between these categories.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout. The memory tools use clear action verbs (clear, delete, get, list, set) paired with 'memory', while the execution tools use 'run_' followed by the language, and web_search follows the same convention. All names are in snake_case with no deviations.
Tool Count4/5
With 8 tools, the count is reasonable for a toolkit server. However, the scope feels slightly broad, combining memory management, code execution in two languages, and web search into one server, which might be better split. The tools earn their place, but the domain is not tightly focused.
Completeness4/5
For the memory domain, the tools provide complete CRUD coverage (set, get, delete, list, clear). For code execution, both JavaScript and Python are covered. The web_search tool adds internet capability. Minor gaps include no update operation for memory (though set can overwrite) and no tool for executing other languages, but agents can work around these.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues