A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceDynamic multi-agent debate MCP server for structured argumentation and reasoning among AI agents.
1
7
MIT
moamcp
by Yorha9e
Related Servers
Alternatives to moamcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that orchestrates structured multi-round debates between ChatGPT Web and Gemini Web in the same Chrome browser via CDP, requiring no API keys.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multi-agent debate cross-examination and consensus arbitration through a deterministic, zero-dependency MCP server, providing structured outputs and telemetry for autonomous AI workflows.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables running position-driven adversarial debates and code reviews between AI agents via MCP tools, supporting custom positions, multiple rounds, and local CLI models like Claude, Codex, and Gemini.1371MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables multi-round AI expert debates with dynamic expert generation, cross-debate, and Tufte-style infographic export.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables multi-model debate and consensus building through a single tool. It orchestrates multiple AI models from various providers to debate topics and reach validated conclusions with real-time progress tracking.63MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 38 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with domain prefixes (board, tip, handoff, tower) separating clusters. Even similar actions like wait_turn, board_wait, and tower_wait are unambiguous due to their domain-specific descriptions and argument payloads.
Naming Consistency3/5
Most tools follow a moa_<domain>_<verb> pattern (e.g., board_write, tip_create, handoff_send), but debate tools use verb_noun order (start_debate, wait_turn) and two tools are noun-only (status, status_agents). This mix of conventions is readable but not fully consistent.
Tool Count2/5
With 38 tools, the server significantly exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. While the breadth reflects a complex multi-agent orchestration domain, the sheer number makes the surface feel heavy and harder to navigate in an MCP context.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides full lifecycle coverage for every subdomain: debate (init/start/wait/submit/complete), blackboard (write/read/list/wait/delete), tips (CRUD+archive), handoffs (send/inbox/read/consume/archive), and the tower workflow (boot/plan/spawn/register/mission/review/merge/teardown/status/ci/wait/progress). No obvious dead ends or missing operations.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues