Skip to main content
Glama
YonggangG

zemax-mcp

by YonggangG
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to zemax-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • zemax-mcp

      dongzhaohe321418-lab
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Safety-first MCP server enabling AI assistants to drive Zemax OpticStudio sequential-mode optical design workflows, including a mock backend for validation.
      1
      -

    • PC Bridge

      Martin123132
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets supported AI clients like ChatGPT and Claude use locally authorised Windows tools, files, project tasks, commands, and local state, with configurable per-client authority and global access modes.
      -

    • Windows MCP for ChatGPT & Grok

      sakusaku0214
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted server that lets ChatGPT, Grok, and stdio MCP clients read and write files, run PowerShell/CMD and interactive processes, and drive the Windows desktop through screenshots, window info, clicks, drags, and keyboard input. It connects via OpenAI Secure MCP Tunnels, an OAuth authorization-code + S256 PKCE HTTPS endpoint, or local stdio, exposing 38 tools under the user's own Windows account.
      MIT

    • Free Codin Agent

      office233
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This MCP server gives an AI coding host controlled, client-agnostic access to a local machine's developer capabilities: transactional file edits, shell and PTY execution, Git and project inspection, language-server operations, isolated browser automation, Windows UI automation, VS Code state, durable jobs, and checkpoints, all bounded by filesystem root allowlisting and resource admission controls. It speaks standard MCP over stdio, Streamable HTTP, and legacy HTTP+SSE, and can also run headless as a long-lived job runner without any hosted model vendor.
      114
      ISC

    • MCP_Chatgpt

      hoafff
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local Windows MCP server that lets a ChatGPT/OpenAI MCP client list, read, write, search, move, and delete files within allowed roots, run PowerShell/CLI commands, start and manage long-running processes, and inspect or commit/push Git repositories. It binds to loopback with policy-gated shell and Git mutations plus a local JSONL audit log.
      MIT

    • SolidWorks MCP Bridge

      Said-AER
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates local LLMs (via Ollama) with SolidWorks through its COM API, enabling read-only inspection of features, dimensions, equations, mass properties, and file exports. It supports models like Qwen3 and plans future expansion to editing and generation.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 143 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily, including legacy wrappers alongside modern equivalents (e.g., zemax_set_surface vs zemax_lde_set_surface, zemax_optimization_wizard vs zemax_merit_wizard) and multiple spot/MTF/detector variants. Descriptions sometimes clarify legacy status, but the boundaries remain unclear and misselection is likely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools use a consistent zemax_ prefix and snake_case, and getter/setter pairs follow predictable verb_noun patterns. However, many analysis tools use noun phrases (e.g., zemax_fft_mtf, zemax_ray_fan) and legacy wrappers introduce minor naming deviations.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 143 tools, this server is far beyond any reasonable MCP tool surface, even for a complex optical design domain. The set includes many legacy wrappers and overlapping analysis/detector variants, making it an extreme mismatch rather than a well-scoped collection.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers sequential and non-sequential systems, surface/object CRUD, optimization, tolerancing, numerous analyses, file lifecycle, and configuration handling. No obvious core gaps are apparent for the stated optical design purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources