Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Yedigarli

scandiary

by Yedigarli
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to scandiary

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Navable MCP

      web-DnA
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to perform real-browser accessibility scanning of localhost pages using Playwright and axe-core, returning WCAG 2.1 violations with structured fix plans.
      3
      22 npm
      1
      MIT
    • a11yscope by perceivable

      a11yscopeofficial

      perceivable
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility checks for a URL or for HTML the agent just wrote, run locally in headless Chrome. 31 checks with CSS selectors, snippets and fix guidance; the same engine as the A11yScope Chrome extension.
      1
      -

    • a11y-mcp

      antonio-rmrz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables web accessibility audits using axe-core, allowing users to scan URLs, check WCAG compliance levels, and export reports. It uses an anti-detect browser to bypass Cloudflare and other bot protection.
      7
      35 PyPI
      MIT

    • Accessibility MCP Server

      jbuchan
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive accessibility audits on websites using Playwright and axe-core against WCAG standards. Provides detailed compliance reports with violation summaries and remediation guidance across multiple browsers.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Let your AI agent see the webWeb-to-screenshot MCP for Claude, Cursor and Codex. No cookie banners. Free to start.snap-render.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool there is nothing to confuse; its purpose (run an axe-core accessibility audit and return a fix prompt) is unambiguous. No overlap or boundary issues are possible in a single-tool surface.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    check_accessibility follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention that reads naturally and matches the action performed. Nothing else exists to break the pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is defensible for a narrowly scoped accessibility-checking server, but it feels thin — there is no option to list rules, scan multiple URLs, or retrieve prior results. The surface is one monolithic operation with no supporting tools.

    Completeness3/5

    The core operation (scan a site, return issues plus fix guidance) is covered, and the description honestly notes that automated checks catch only about a third of problems. However, there are no tools or parameters for rule selection, WCAG level control, multi-page/batch scanning, or exported reports, leaving notable gaps for real audit workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources