Permanently delete a discount by its ID. This action cannot be undone, so use it to remove unwanted discounts from your Lemon Squeezy store.
Permanently delete a discount. This is irreversible.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| discountId | Yes | The discount ID to delete |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.10.10Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds 'Permanently delete' and 'irreversible,' which reinforce the destructive nature but do not provide substantial new behavioral information beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no filler. Every word adds value, stating action and irreversibility.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple one-parameter tool and rich annotations, the description is adequate. Could mention that the discount must exist or error handling, but not strictly necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter discountId, with a clear description. The tool description does not add any further semantic context for the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'delete' and the resource 'discount', and explicitly notes it's permanent and irreversible. It distinguishes from sibling tools like ls_create_discount or ls_get_discount.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., soft deletion or archiving). No mention of prerequisites or contextual triggers.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.