Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ansible-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe, local DevOps inspection through a JSON-lines server with schema validation, path isolation, and redaction, supporting read-only Git operations, Kubernetes YAML validation, Terraform plan summaries, and sanitized log analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This Model Context Protocol server enables AI assistants to interact directly with Ansible, allowing them to execute playbooks, manage inventory, check syntax, and perform other Ansible operations.
      18
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes the scan_text and scan_paths tools so AI coding agents can scan text, files, staged Git changes, local history and archives for secrets entirely offline, returning redacted findings with rules, positions and fingerprints and flagging incomplete scans. Results can be emitted as JSON, JSONL or SARIF without ever serializing raw secret values or source snippets.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that enables inspecting and auditing markdown agent steering files such as CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, SKILL.md, rules, commands and memory files. It reads files byte-exactly, outlines headings, lints frontmatter, invisible characters and broken links, estimates per-session token budgets, and locates steering files by when they load, all without ever writing, deleting or making network calls.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets an agent audit its own environment by discovering local MCP configurations and skill folders on Windows, macOS, and Linux and running offline static checks for prompt injection, hidden instructions, hardcoded secrets, dangerous commands, unpinned packages, and excessive filesystem or transport permissions. It exposes tools to scan everything discovered, list configurations, vet a single skill, or analyze supplied text, returning text, JSON, SARIF, or HTML findings with CI-friendly severity levels.
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only local MCP server for inspecting AgentInspect TypeScript AI-agent traces. Lists runs, exposes bounded causal-failure and TraceFacts evidence, evaluates TraceContract checks, compares runs, and creates share-checked evidence without mutating traces or invoking agent tools.
      8,881 npm
      168
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct facet of Ansible project analysis: inventory, config, project info, playbook structure, role interface, module docs/search, task-arg validation, collections requirements, lint summary, and upgrade impact. The descriptions explicitly differentiate overlapping-sounding tools (e.g., ansible_check_task_args vs ansible_lint_summary, ansible_module_doc vs ansible_module_search), leaving no real ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent ansible_ prefix and snake_case, which is highly predictable. The only minor deviation is mixed verb/noun construction (ansible_check_task_args and ansible_module_search are verb-led, while most others are noun phrases), but this remains readable and consistent enough.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a read-only Ansible project analysis server. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct inspection or validation concern, with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is broad and complete for read-only analysis: project info, config, inventory, playbook structure, roles, modules, task args, collections, lint, and upgrade impact are all covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit variable-precedence or host-fact inspection tool, but these are largely workaroundable or intentionally out of scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues