Finish CityJSON upload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It states that validation and registration occur, implying mutation, but omits validation failure behavior, whether upload_id is consumed, idempotency, required permissions, and what registration changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no redundant wording. It is efficiently sized for the information it conveys, though that information is limited.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a side-effecting finalization tool with no annotations, no output schema, and an undocumented upload_id, the definition is too sparse. It omits workflow prerequisites, validation failure outcomes, and return/registration details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single required upload_id parameter has 0% schema description coverage, and the description does not mention it or explain that it comes from the upload workflow. The UUID format is in the schema, but the semantic linkage to upload_start/chunk is missing; only the parameter name supplies meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb combination ('Validate and register') and resource ('uploaded CityJSON file'), making the tool's function clear. It does not distinguish this finalization step from sibling tools such as cityjson_validate or cityjson_upload, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no explicit when-to-use guidance or prerequisites. It does not say that it should follow cityjson_upload_start/chunk, nor when to choose it over cityjson_validate or cityjson_upload; only the word 'finish' implies sequencing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.