Skip to main content
Glama
Yangleduo00337788

Karpathy Guidelines MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Karpathy Guidelines MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects LLMs to GitHub and GitLab to analyze pull and merge requests for logic, security, and architectural alignment. It provides tools for fetching diffs, file contents, and project metadata, alongside guided prompts for professional code reviews.
      10
      12 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with professional coding standards, development best practices, and context-aware guidance through static documentation and AI-powered custom recommendations. Enables agents to access comprehensive development guidelines including coding rules, debugging techniques, and AI steering instructions.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered code review and improvement, including analysis, refactoring suggestions, and automatic test generation, with an optional agentic loop for iterative refinement.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to enforce UI/UX best practices and backend performance auditing, providing design guidelines, compliance checks, component search, and performance optimizations to eliminate generic or sloppy code.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with queryable, version-controlled project rules and coding standards. Enables validation, rule-based guidance, and task summaries to keep AI work aligned with your project's conventions without repeating context.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have distinctly different purposes: one retrieves guidelines, the other reviews code. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_guidelines, review_code), making naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools is minimal but sufficient for the focused domain of guideline retrieval and code review. It is borderline but acceptable.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers its stated purpose completely: retrieving the full guidelines and reviewing code against them. No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues